mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Modeling Inverse Ellipsometry Problem via Flow Matching with a Large-Scale Dataset

arXiv 2407.17869 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2024cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Inverse ellipsometry, i.e., reconstructing optical constants and film thickness from the measured phase difference Delta and amplitude ratio Psi, is a fundamentally ill-posed problem. Traditional solutions rely on slow, expert-driven iterative fitting, while the development of machine learning approaches has been severely limited by the lack of large-scale, physically consistent datasets. To address this gap, we introduce EllipBench, a comprehensive benchmark comprising over 8 million high-precision samples spanning 98 thin-film materials and 5 substrates. Building upon this benchmark, we conduct a systematic evaluation of a broad spectrum of methods, including traditional machine learning models, deep neural networks, and Physics-Informed Neural Networks, and show that existing paradigms consistently struggle to fully resolve the inverse ellipsometry task. To better capture its inherent ambiguity, we further propose a novel Decoupled Conditional Flow Matching (DCFM) framework. Rather than formulating the problem as deterministic point-to-point regression, DCFM explicitly decouples geometric film thickness and incorporates it as a robust physical condition to guide a continuous vector field for modeling the inverse probability distribution of wavelength-dependent optical constants. Combined with a gradient detachment strategy and physics-based constraints, our joint architecture effectively mitigates intrinsic physical ambiguities and delivers a robust and accurate solution for inverse ellipsometry.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 10 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2024.

Builds on

10 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct

Other references · 9

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  3. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
  4. 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 964
  5. 2020Deep Learning Techniques for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 290
  6. 2018Analyzing Inverse Problems with Invertible Neural Networkscited by 239
  7. 2017Solving ill-posed inverse problems using iterative deep neural networkscited by 145
  8. 2022Machine Learning-enhanced Efficient Spectroscopic Ellipsometry Modelingcited by 1
  9. 2022EllipsoNet: Deep-learning-enabled optical ellipsometry for complex thin filmscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Joint Discrete-Continuous Flow Matching for Open-Vocabulary Inverse Design of Multilayer Optical Coatings
  2. 2026Inverse Design of Optical Multilayer Thin Films using Robust Masked Diffusion Models
  3. 2026Parameter Inference and Uncertainty Quantification with Diffusion Models: Extending CDI to 2D Spatial Conditioning
  4. 2025PureSample: Neural Materials Learned by Sampling Microgeometry
  5. 2026Fast and Faithful: Principled Conditional Flow Matching for Inverse Problems
  6. 2026Physics-Based Flow Matching for Full-Field Prediction of Silicon Photonic Devices
  7. 2025Physics-Constrained Fine-Tuning of Flow-Matching Models for Generation and Inverse Problems
  8. 2026UniPixie: Unified and Probabilistic 3D Physics Learning via Flow Matching