mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Formalising causal inference as prediction on a target population

arXiv 2407.17385 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2024stat.ME cs.LG econ.EMcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The standard approach to causal modelling especially in social and health sciences is the potential outcomes framework due to Neyman and Rubin. In this framework, observations are thought to be drawn from a distribution over variables of interest, and the goal is to identify parameters of this distribution. Even though the stated goal is often to inform decision making on some target population, there is no straightforward way to include these target populations in the framework. Instead of modelling the relationship between the observed sample and the target population, the inductive assumptions in this framework take the form of abstract sampling and independence assumptions. In this paper, we develop a version of this framework that construes causal inference as treatment-wise predictions for finite populations where all assumptions are testable in retrospect; this means that one can not only test predictions themselves (without any fundamental problem) but also investigate sources of error when they fail. Due to close connections to the original framework, established methods can still be be analysed under the new framework.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2024.

Builds on

2 of 74 references.

References · 2

  1. 2015Recursive Partitioning for Heterogeneous Causal Effectscited by 254
  2. 2022Fairness and Randomness in Machine Learning: Statistical Independence and Relativizationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.