SECRM-2D: RL-Based Efficient and Comfortable Route-Following Autonomous Driving with Analytic Safety Guarantees
On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Reinforcement learning for driving
Abstract (arXiv)
Over the last decade, there has been increasing interest in autonomous driving systems. Reinforcement Learning (RL) shows great promise for training autonomous driving controllers, being able to directly optimize a combination of criteria such as efficiency comfort, and stability. However, RL- based controllers typically offer no safety guarantees, making their readiness for real deployment questionable. In this paper, we propose SECRM-2D (the Safe, Efficient and Comfortable RL- based driving Model with Lane-Changing), an RL autonomous driving controller (both longitudinal and lateral) that balances optimization of efficiency and comfort and follows a fixed route, while being subject to hard analytic safety constraints. The aforementioned safety constraints are derived from the criterion that the follower vehicle must have sufficient headway to be able to avoid a crash if the leader vehicle brakes suddenly. We evaluate SECRM-2D against several learning and non-learning baselines in simulated test scenarios, including freeway driving, exiting, merging, and emergency braking. Our results confirm that representative previously-published RL AV controllers may crash in both training and testing, even if they are optimizing a safety objective. By contrast, our controller SECRM-2D is successful in avoiding crashes during both training and testing, improves over the baselines in measures of efficiency and comfort, and is more faithful in following the prescribed route. In addition, we achieve a good theoretical understanding of the longitudinal steady-state of a collection of SECRM-2D vehicles.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 8 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2024.
Builds on
8 of 31 references.
References · 8
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2019Safe, Efficient, and Comfortable Velocity Control based on Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 56
- 2019Combining Planning and Deep Reinforcement Learning in Tactical Decision Making for Autonomous Drivingcited by 52
- 2023State-wise Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 48
- 2020Automated Lane Change Strategy using Proximal Policy Optimization-based Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
- 2019Driving Decision and Control for Autonomous Lane Change based on Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
- 2022Bilateral Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Better-than-human Car Following Modelcited by 3
- 2019Efficient Motion Planning for Automated Lane Change based on Imitation Learning and Mixed-Integer Optimizationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Balancing Progress and Safety: A Novel Risk-Aware Objective for RL in Autonomous Driving
- 2026Safe Reinforcement Learning of Autonomous Highway Driving: A Unified Framework for Safety and Efficiency
- 2022SafeRL-Kit: Evaluating Efficient Reinforcement Learning Methods for Safe Autonomous Driving
- 2021Minimizing Safety Interference for Safe and Comfortable Automated Driving with Distributional Reinforcement Learning
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving with Safety and Exploration Enhancement
- 2024Long and Short-Term Constraints Driven Safe Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving
- 2024Optimizing Autonomous Driving for Safety: A Human-Centric Approach with LLM-Enhanced RLHF
- 2021Runtime Safety Assurance for Learning-enabled Control of Autonomous Driving Vehicles