mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Modelling brain connectomes networks: Solv is a worthy competitor to hyperbolic geometry!

arXiv 2407.16077 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2024q-bio.NC cs.AI math.MGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Finding suitable embeddings for connectomes (spatially embedded complex networks that map neural connections in the brain) is crucial for analyzing and understanding cognitive processes. Recent studies have found two-dimensional hyperbolic embeddings superior to Euclidean embeddings in modeling connectomes across species, especially human connectomes. However, those studies had limitations: geometries other than Euclidean, hyperbolic, or spherical were not considered. Following William Thurston's suggestion that the networks of neurons in the brain could be successfully represented in Solv geometry, we study the goodness-of-fit of the embeddings for 21 connectome networks (8 species). To this end, we suggest an embedding algorithm based on Simulating Annealing that allows us to embed connectomes to Euclidean, Spherical, Hyperbolic, Solv, Nil, and product geometries. Our algorithm tends to find better embeddings than the state-of-the-art, even in the hyperbolic case. Our findings suggest that while three-dimensional hyperbolic embeddings yield the best results in many cases, Solv embeddings perform reasonably well.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2024.

Builds on

3 of 31 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019Mercator: uncovering faithful hyperbolic embeddings of complex networkscited by 10
  2. 2013MIGRAINE: MRI Graph Reliability Analysis and Inference for Connectomicscited by 4
  3. 2020Real-Time Visualization in Non-Isotropic Geometriescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.