mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How to Shrink Confidence Sets for Many Equivalent Discrete Distributions?

arXiv 2407.15662 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2024stat.ML cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider the situation when a learner faces a set of unknown discrete distributions (pk)k∈ mathcal K defined over a common alphabet mathcal X, and can build for each distribution pk an individual high-probability confidence set thanks to nk observations sampled from pk. The set (pk)k∈ mathcal K is structured: each distribution pk is obtained from the same common, but unknown, distribution q via applying an unknown permutation to mathcal X. We call this permutation-equivalence. The goal is to build refined confidence sets exploiting this structural property. Like other popular notions of structure (Lipschitz smoothness, Linearity, etc.) permutation-equivalence naturally appears in machine learning problems, and to benefit from its potential gain calls for a specific approach. We present a strategy to effectively exploit permutation-equivalence, and provide a finite-time high-probability bound on the size of the refined confidence sets output by the strategy. Since a refinement is not possible for too few observations in general, under mild technical assumptions, our finite-time analysis establish when the number of observations (nk)k∈ mathcal K are large enough so that the output confidence sets improve over initial individual sets. We carefully characterize this event and the corresponding improvement. Further, our result implies that the size of confidence sets shrink at asymptotic rates of O(1/√sumk∈ mathcal K nk) and O(1/maxk∈ K nk), respectively for elements inside and outside the support of q, when the size of each individual confidence set shrinks at respective rates of O(1/√nk) and O(1/nk). We illustrate the practical benefit of exploiting permutation equivalence on a reinforcement learning task.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2024.

Builds on

6 of 33 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Tightening Exploration in Upper Confidence Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
  2. 2016A Permutation-based Model for Crowd Labeling: Optimal Estimation and Robustnesscited by 13
  3. 2013Large Deviation Methods for Approximate Probabilistic Inferencecited by 12
  4. 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Exploiting State-Action Equivalencecited by 6
  5. 2018Permutation-based simultaneous confidence bounds for the false discovery proportioncited by 3
  6. 2013Bandit Online Optimization Over the Permutahedroncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning Permutation Distributions via Reflected Diffusion on Ranks
  2. 2026Limits of Confidence in Diffusion
  3. 2026Statistical Unlearning of Distributions: A Hypothesis Testing Approach
  4. 2025Gaussian Certified Unlearning in High Dimensions: A Hypothesis Testing Approach
  5. 2026Exact Minimum-Volume Confidence Set Intersection for Multinomial Outcomes
  6. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning
  7. 2025The Space Complexity of Learning-Unlearning Algorithms
  8. 2025Distributional Machine Unlearning via Selective Data Removal