mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explainability Paths for Sustained Artistic Practice with AI

arXiv 2407.15216 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2024cs.SD cs.AI eess.AScited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The development of AI-driven generative audio mirrors broader AI trends, often prioritizing immediate accessibility at the expense of explainability. Consequently, integrating such tools into sustained artistic practice remains a significant challenge. In this paper, we explore several paths to improve explainability, drawing primarily from our research-creation practice in training and implementing generative audio models. As practical provisions for improved explainability, we highlight human agency over training materials, the viability of small-scale datasets, the facilitation of the iterative creative process, and the integration of interactive machine learning as a mapping tool. Importantly, these steps aim to enhance human agency over generative AI systems not only during model inference, but also when curating and preprocessing training data as well as during the training phase of models.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2024.

Builds on

7 of 15 references.

References · 7

  1. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  2. 2020Jukebox: A Generative Model for Musiccited by 542
  3. 2018Understanding disentangling in β-VAEcited by 335
  4. 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 167
  5. 2021RAVE: A variational autoencoder for fast and high-quality neural audio synthesiscited by 73
  6. 2022Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologiescited by 29
  7. 2018Generating Albums with SampleRNN to Imitate Metal, Rock, and Punk Bandscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.