mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Downstream-Pretext Domain Knowledge Traceback for Active Learning

arXiv 2407.14720 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2024cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active learning (AL) is designed to construct a high-quality labeled dataset by iteratively selecting the most informative samples. Such sampling heavily relies on data representation, while recently pre-training is popular for robust feature learning. However, as pre-training utilizes low-level pretext tasks that lack annotation, directly using pre-trained representation in AL is inadequate for determining the sampling score. To address this problem, we propose a downstream-pretext domain knowledge traceback (DOKT) method that traces the data interactions of downstream knowledge and pre-training guidance for selecting diverse and instructive samples near the decision boundary. DOKT consists of a traceback diversity indicator and a domain-based uncertainty estimator. The diversity indicator constructs two feature spaces based on the pre-training pretext model and the downstream knowledge from annotation, by which it locates the neighbors of unlabeled data from the downstream space in the pretext space to explore the interaction of samples. With this mechanism, DOKT unifies the data relations of low-level and high-level representations to estimate traceback diversity. Next, in the uncertainty estimator, domain mixing is designed to enforce perceptual perturbing to unlabeled samples with similar visual patches in the pretext space. Then the divergence of perturbed samples is measured to estimate the domain uncertainty. As a result, DOKT selects the most diverse and important samples based on these two modules. The experiments conducted on ten datasets show that our model outperforms other state-of-the-art methods and generalizes well to various application scenarios such as semantic segmentation and image captioning.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2024.

Builds on

31 of 68 references.

References · 31

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  5. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  7. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  8. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  9. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,472
  10. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
  11. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  12. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
19 more
  1. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
  2. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
  3. 2019Learning Loss for Active Learningcited by 335
  4. 2019Variational Adversarial Active Learningcited by 284
  5. 2017Suggestive Annotation: A Deep Active Learning Framework for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 145
  6. 2020Contextual Diversity for Active Learningcited by 139
  7. 2020Task-Aware Variational Adversarial Active Learningcited by 84
  8. 2021On Statistical Bias In Active Learning: How and When To Fix Itcited by 72
  9. 2020Sequential Graph Convolutional Network for Active Learningcited by 69
  10. 2022Active Learning by Feature Mixingcited by 63
  11. 2020State-Relabeling Adversarial Active Learningcited by 60
  12. 2021Towards Fewer Annotations: Active Learning via Region Impurity and Prediction Uncertainty for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 56
  13. 2021Semi-Supervised Active Learning with Temporal Output Discrepancycited by 50
  14. 2022PT4AL: Using Self-Supervised Pretext Tasks for Active Learningcited by 27
  15. 2020VaB-AL: Incorporating Class Imbalance and Difficulty with Variational Bayes for Active Learningcited by 25
  16. 2022Entity-enhanced Adaptive Reconstruction Network for Weakly Supervised Referring Expression Groundingcited by 22
  17. 2016Active and Continuous Exploration with Deep Neural Networks and Expected Model Output Changescited by 18
  18. 2020PAL : Pretext-based Active Learningcited by 9
  19. 2021Scalable Batch-Mode Deep Bayesian Active Learning via Equivalence Class Annealingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.