Physics-guided Active Sample Reweighting for Urban Flow Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Urban flow prediction is a spatio-temporal modeling task that estimates the throughput of transportation services like buses, taxis, and ride-sharing, where data-driven models have become the most popular solution in the past decade. Meanwhile, the implicitly learned mapping between historical observations to the prediction targets tend to over-simplify the dynamics of real-world urban flows, leading to suboptimal predictions. Some recent spatio-temporal prediction solutions bring remedies with the notion of physics-guided machine learning (PGML), which describes spatio-temporal data with nuanced and principled physics laws, thus enhancing both the prediction accuracy and interpretability. However, these spatio-temporal PGML methods are built upon a strong assumption that the observed data fully conforms to the differential equations that define the physical system, which can quickly become ill-posed in urban flow prediction tasks. The observed urban flow data, especially when sliced into time-dependent snapshots to facilitate predictions, is typically incomplete and sparse, and prone to inherent noise incurred in the collection process. As a result, such physical inconsistency between the data and PGML model significantly limits the predictive power and robustness of the solution. Moreover, due to the interval-based predictions and intermittent nature of data filing in many transportation services, the instantaneous dynamics of urban flows can hardly be captured, rendering differential equation-based continuous modeling a loose fit for this setting. To overcome the challenges, we develop a discretized physics-guided network (PN), and propose a data-aware framework Physics-guided Active Sample Reweighting (P-GASR) to enhance PN. Experimental results in four real-world datasets demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance with a demonstrable improvement in robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2024.
Builds on
19 of 58 references.
References · 19
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
- 2017Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Forecastingcited by 1,125
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
- 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 358
- 2016Deep Spatio-Temporal Residual Networks for Citywide Crowd Flows Predictioncited by 330
- 2020Social-STGCNN: A Social Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Neural Network for Human Trajectory Predictioncited by 324
- 2020Spatial-Temporal Fusion Graph Neural Networks for Traffic Flow Forecastingcited by 212
- 2022Spatial-Temporal Identity: A Simple yet Effective Baseline for Multivariate Time Series Forecastingcited by 149
- 2018Revisiting Spatial-Temporal Similarity: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Predictioncited by 119
7 more
- 2022Spatio-Temporal Self-Supervised Learning for Traffic Flow Predictioncited by 77
- 2020Coupled Layer-wise Graph Convolution for Transportation Demand Predictioncited by 54
- 2022STDEN: Towards Physics-Guided Neural Networks for Traffic Flow Predictioncited by 45
- 2018Bike Flow Prediction with Multi-Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 42
- 2022EINNs: Epidemiologically-informed Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2021Passenger Mobility Prediction via Representation Learning for Dynamic Directed and Weighted Graphcited by 7
- 2017A Location-Sentiment-Aware Recommender System for Both Home-Town and Out-of-Town Userscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.