Exploring End-to-end Differentiable Neural Charged Particle Tracking -- A Loss Landscape Perspective
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Measurement and analysis of high energetic particles for scientific, medical or industrial applications is a complex procedure, requiring the design of sophisticated detector and data processing systems. The development of adaptive and differentiable software pipelines using a combination of conventional and machine learning algorithms is therefore getting ever more important to optimize and operate the system efficiently while maintaining end-to-end (E2E) differentiability. We propose for the application of charged particle tracking an E2E differentiable decision-focused learning scheme using graph neural networks with combinatorial components solving a linear assignment problem for each detector layer. We demonstrate empirically that including differentiable variations of discrete assignment operations allows for efficient network optimization, working better or on par with approaches that lack E2E differentiability. In additional studies, we dive deeper into the optimization process and provide further insights from a loss landscape perspective. We demonstrate that while both methods converge into similar performing, globally well-connected regions, they suffer under substantial predictive instability across initialization and optimization methods, which can have unpredictable consequences on the performance of downstream tasks such as image reconstruction. We also point out a dependency between the interpolation factor of the gradient estimator and the prediction stability of the model, suggesting the choice of sufficiently small values. Given the strong global connectivity of learned solutions and the excellent training performance, we argue that E2E differentiability provides, besides the general availability of gradient information, an important tool for robust particle tracking to mitigate prediction instabilities by favoring solutions that perform well on downstream tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2024.
Builds on
44 of 88 references.
References · 44
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,106
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,991
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,719
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,129
- 2017OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networkscited by 592
- 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 586
- 2017Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 518
- 2016Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physicscited by 505
- 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 465
- 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 366
- 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 358
- 2018How Does Batch Normalization Help Optimization?cited by 355
32 more
- 2017Smart "Predict, then Optimize"cited by 338
- 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 329
- 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 291
- 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 241
- 2019Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial Solverscited by 226
- 2018Melding the Data-Decisions Pipeline: Decision-Focused Learning for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 225
- 2021End-to-End Constrained Optimization Learning: A Surveycited by 155
- 2023Decision-Focused Learning: Foundations, State of the Art, Benchmark and Future Opportunitiescited by 130
- 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 128
- 2020Deep Graph Matching via Blackbox Differentiation of Combinatorial Solverscited by 81
- 2019Optimizing Rank-based Metrics with Blackbox Differentiationcited by 58
- 2022Linear Connectivity Reveals Generalization Strategiescited by 55
- 2020Contrastive Losses and Solution Caching for Predict-and-Optimizecited by 52
- 2022Mechanistic Mode Connectivitycited by 50
- 2020Fast Rates for Contextual Linear Optimizationcited by 43
- 2021Taxonomizing local versus global structure in neural network loss landscapescited by 34
- 2021Performance of a Geometric Deep Learning Pipeline for HL-LHC Particle Trackingcited by 29
- 2022Backpropagation through Combinatorial Algorithms: Identity with Projection Workscited by 29
- 2020Object condensation: one-stage grid-free multi-object reconstruction in physics detectors, graph and image datacited by 23
- 2020Accelerated Charged Particle Tracking with Graph Neural Networks on FPGAscited by 23
- 2018Using Mode Connectivity for Loss Landscape Analysiscited by 20
- 2023Estimate-Then-Optimize versus Integrated-Estimation-Optimization versus Sample Average Approximation: A Stochastic Dominance Perspectivecited by 20
- 2021Charged particle tracking via edge-classifying interaction networkscited by 19
- 2016On Human Intellect and Machine Failures: Troubleshooting Integrative Machine Learning Systemscited by 18
- 2021Graph Neural Networks for Charged Particle Tracking on FPGAscited by 17
- 2022Decision-Focused Learning without Differentiable Optimization: Learning Locally Optimized Decision Lossescited by 12
- 2023High Pileup Particle Tracking with Object Condensationcited by 7
- 2022End-to-end multi-particle reconstruction in high occupancy imaging calorimeters with graph neural networkscited by 6
- 2022On the Prediction Instability of Graph Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2022DiffML: End-to-end Differentiable ML Pipelinescited by 6
- 2019GradVis: Visualization and Second Order Analysis of Optimization Surfaces during the Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 5
- 2022Instability in clinical risk stratification models using deep learningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.