mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond the Veil of Similarity: Quantifying Semantic Continuity in Explainable AI

arXiv 2407.12950 ↗First posted 17 Jul 2024cs.AI cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a novel metric for measuring semantic continuity in Explainable AI methods and machine learning models. We posit that for models to be truly interpretable and trustworthy, similar inputs should yield similar explanations, reflecting a consistent semantic understanding. By leveraging XAI techniques, we assess semantic continuity in the task of image recognition. We conduct experiments to observe how incremental changes in input affect the explanations provided by different XAI methods. Through this approach, we aim to evaluate the models' capability to generalize and abstract semantic concepts accurately and to evaluate different XAI methods in correctly capturing the model behaviour. This paper contributes to the broader discourse on AI interpretability by proposing a quantitative measure for semantic continuity for XAI methods, offering insights into the models' and explainers' internal reasoning processes, and promoting more reliable and transparent AI systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2024.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  5. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  7. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  8. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
  9. 2020InterFaceGAN: Interpreting the Disentangled Face Representation Learned by GANscited by 394
  10. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 302
  11. 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
  12. 2019Benchmarking Attribution Methods with Relative Feature Importancecited by 89
7 more
  1. 2021Synthetic Benchmarks for Scientific Research in Explainable Machine Learningcited by 59
  2. 2022SAFARI: Versatile and Efficient Evaluations for Robustness of Interpretabilitycited by 28
  3. 2022OmniXAI: A Library for Explainable AIcited by 21
  4. 2023The Co-12 Recipe for Evaluating Interpretable Part-Prototype Image Classifierscited by 15
  5. 2022Why Should I Choose You? AutoXAI: A Framework for Selecting and Tuning eXplainable AI Solutionscited by 10
  6. 2021Interactive Analysis of CNN Robustnesscited by 4
  7. 2020An Experimental Study of Semantic Continuity for Deep Learning Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Towards Transparent AI: A Survey on Explainable Large Language Models
  2. 2025Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): from inherent explainability to large language models
  3. 2024Benchmarking XAI Explanations with Human-Aligned Evaluations
  4. 2024Decompose the model: Mechanistic interpretability in image models with Generalized Integrated Gradients (GIG)
  5. 2026Position: Explainability Research Must Prioritize Foundations over Ad-hoc Methods
  6. 2025A Survey on Interpretability in Visual Recognition
  7. 2023Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Review of Methodological Advances and Future Research Directions
  8. 2026ConceptSMILE: Auditing the Trustworthiness of Concept-Based Explainable AI