mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Why Should I Choose You? AutoXAI: A Framework for Selecting and Tuning eXplainable AI Solutions

arXiv 2210.02795 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2022cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, a large number of XAI (eXplainable Artificial Intelligence) solutions have been proposed to explain existing ML (Machine Learning) models or to create interpretable ML models. Evaluation measures have recently been proposed and it is now possible to compare these XAI solutions. However, selecting the most relevant XAI solution among all this diversity is still a tedious task, especially when meeting specific needs and constraints. In this paper, we propose AutoXAI, a framework that recommends the best XAI solution and its hyperparameters according to specific XAI evaluation metrics while considering the user's context (dataset, ML model, XAI needs and constraints). It adapts approaches from context-aware recommender systems and strategies of optimization and evaluation from AutoML (Automated Machine Learning). We apply AutoXAI to two use cases, and show that it recommends XAI solutions adapted to the user's needs with the best hyperparameters matching the user's constraints.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2022.

Builds on

20 of 47 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  4. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  5. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  6. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  7. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  8. 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 388
  9. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
  10. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 309
  11. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 299
  12. 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 251
8 more
  1. 2019One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniquescited by 164
  2. 2020The role of explainability in creating trustworthy artificial intelligence for health care: a comprehensive survey of the terminology, design choices, and evaluation strategiescited by 91
  3. 2021Explanations in Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 80
  4. 2020On quantitative aspects of model interpretabilitycited by 71
  5. 2017Distill-and-Compare: Auditing Black-Box Models Using Transparent Model Distillationcited by 62
  6. 2018Recurrent Neural Network Attention Mechanisms for Interpretable System Log Anomaly Detectioncited by 21
  7. 2021XAI Handbook: Towards a Unified Framework for Explainable AIcited by 14
  8. 2021How to choose an Explainability Method? Towards a Methodical Implementation of XAI in Practicecited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

10 papers.