Analyzing Large language models chatbots: An experimental approach using a probability test
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study consists of qualitative empirical research, conducted through exploratory tests with two different Large Language Models (LLMs) chatbots: ChatGPT and Gemini. The methodological procedure involved exploratory tests based on prompts designed with a probability question. The "Linda Problem", widely recognized in cognitive psychology, was used as a basis to create the tests, along with the development of a new problem specifically for this experiment, the "Mary Problem". The object of analysis is the dataset with the outputs provided by each chatbot interaction. The purpose of the analysis is to verify whether the chatbots mainly employ logical reasoning that aligns with probability theory or if they are more frequently affected by the stereotypical textual descriptions in the prompts. The findings provide insights about the approach each chatbot employs in handling logic and textual constructions, suggesting that, while the analyzed chatbots perform satisfactorily on a well-known probabilistic problem, they exhibit significantly lower performance on new tests that require direct application of probabilistic logic.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2024.
Builds on
10 of 24 references.
References · 10
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 901
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
- 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 541
- 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 398
- 2023ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of nonecited by 204
- 2021Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Docited by 178
- 2022Language models show human-like content effects on reasoning taskscited by 173
- 2023Clever Hans or Neural Theory of Mind? Stress Testing Social Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 163
- 2022Capturing Failures of Large Language Models via Human Cognitive Biasescited by 98
- 2023Do Large Language Models Show Decision Heuristics Similar to Humans? A Case Study Using GPT-3.5cited by 42
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Assessing the Impact of Prompting Methods on ChatGPT's Mathematical Capabilities
- 2024Testing and Evaluation of Large Language Models: Correctness, Non-Toxicity, and Fairness
- 2025Can Consumer Chatbots Reason? A Student-Led Field Experiment Embedded in an "AI-for-All" Undergraduate Course
- 2024Assessing the Emergent Symbolic Reasoning Abilities of Llama Large Language Models
- 2024Empirical Study of Symmetrical Reasoning in Conversational Chatbots
- 2024How to Align Large Language Models for Teaching English? Designing and Developing LLM based-Chatbot for Teaching English Conversation in EFL, Findings and Limitations
- 2024A Looming Replication Crisis in Evaluating Behavior in Language Models? Evidence and Solutions
- 2024LLaMa-SciQ: An Educational Chatbot for Answering Science MCQ