mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Correlations Are Ruining Your Gradient Descent

arXiv 2407.10780 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.NEcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Herein the topics of (natural) gradient descent, data decorrelation, and approximate methods for backpropagation are brought into a common discussion. Natural gradient descent illuminates how gradient vectors, pointing at directions of steepest descent, can be improved by considering the local curvature of loss landscapes. We extend this perspective and show that to fully solve the problem illuminated by natural gradients in neural networks, one must recognise that correlations in the data at any linear transformation, including node responses at every layer of a neural network, cause a non-orthonormal relationship between the model's parameters. To solve this requires a method for decorrelating inputs at each individual layer of a neural network. We describe a range of methods which have been proposed for decorrelation and whitening of node output, and expand on these to provide a novel method specifically useful for distributed computing and computational neuroscience. Implementing decorrelation within multi-layer neural networks, we can show that not only is training via backpropagation sped up significantly but also existing approximations of backpropagation, which have failed catastrophically in the past, benefit significantly in their accuracy and convergence speed. This has the potential to provide a route forward for approximate gradient descent methods which have previously been discarded, training approaches for analogue and neuromorphic hardware, and potentially insights as to the efficacy and utility of decorrelation processes in the brain.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2024.

Builds on

17 of 35 references.

References · 17

  1. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  2. 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 776
  3. 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 604
  4. 2014New insights and perspectives on the natural gradient methodcited by 435
  5. 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 413
  6. 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 286
  7. 2016Direct Feedback Alignment Provides Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 240
  8. 2018Assessing the Scalability of Biologically-Motivated Deep Learning Algorithms and Architecturescited by 100
  9. 2019Iterative Normalization: Beyond Standardization towards Efficient Whiteningcited by 92
  10. 2018Decorrelated Batch Normalizationcited by 83
  11. 2015Natural Neural Networkscited by 44
  12. 2015A Hebbian/Anti-Hebbian Neural Network for Linear Subspace Learning: A Derivation from Multidimensional Scaling of Streaming Datacited by 26
5 more
  1. 2021Tensor Normal Training for Deep Learning Modelscited by 24
  2. 2020Whitening and second order optimization both make information in the dataset unusable during training, and can reduce or prevent generalizationcited by 14
  3. 2022Constrained Parameter Inference as a Principle for Learningcited by 9
  4. 2024Efficient Deep Learning with Decorrelated Backpropagationcited by 7
  5. 2024Shaping the distribution of neural responses with interneurons in a recurrent circuit modelcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

7 papers.