Aligning Neuronal Coding of Dynamic Visual Scenes with Foundation Vision Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Our brains represent the ever-changing environment with neurons in a highly dynamic fashion. The temporal features of visual pixels in dynamic natural scenes are entrapped in the neuronal responses of the retina. It is crucial to establish the intrinsic temporal relationship between visual pixels and neuronal responses. Recent foundation vision models have paved an advanced way of understanding image pixels. Yet, neuronal coding in the brain largely lacks a deep understanding of its alignment with pixels. Most previous studies employ static images or artificial videos derived from static images for emulating more real and complicated stimuli. Despite these simple scenarios effectively help to separate key factors influencing visual coding, complex temporal relationships receive no consideration. To decompose the temporal features of visual coding in natural scenes, here we propose Vi-ST, a spatiotemporal convolutional neural network fed with a self-supervised Vision Transformer (ViT) prior, aimed at unraveling the temporal-based encoding patterns of retinal neuronal populations. The model demonstrates robust predictive performance in generalization tests. Furthermore, through detailed ablation experiments, we demonstrate the significance of each temporal module. Furthermore, we introduce a visual coding evaluation metric designed to integrate temporal considerations and compare the impact of different numbers of neuronal populations on complementary coding. In conclusion, our proposed Vi-ST demonstrates a novel modeling framework for neuronal coding of dynamic visual scenes in the brain, effectively aligning our brain representation of video with neuronal activity. The code is available at https://github.com/wurining/Vi-ST.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2024.
Builds on
20 of 46 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
- 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,710
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
- 2023CoTracker: It is Better to Track Togethercited by 516
- 2019MS-TCN: Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network for Action Segmentationcited by 370
- 2023SecondPose: SE(3)-Consistent Dual-Stream Feature Fusion for Category-Level Pose Estimationcited by 52
- 2023DVIS++: Improved Decoupled Framework for Universal Video Segmentationcited by 46
8 more
- 2020Tensor Representations for Action Recognitioncited by 28
- 2020Self-supervising Action Recognition by Statistical Moment and Subspace Descriptorscited by 24
- 2023Instance Tracking in 3D Scenes from Egocentric Videoscited by 17
- 2023One-shot Localization and Segmentation of Medical Images with Foundation Modelscited by 13
- 2023The Dynamic Sensorium competition for predicting large-scale mouse visual cortex activity from videoscited by 11
- 2023Temporal Conditioning Spiking Latent Variable Models of the Neural Response to Natural Visual Scenescited by 4
- 2018Revealing Fine Structures of the Retinal Receptive Field by Deep Learning Networkscited by 3
- 2022SpikeSEE: An Energy-Efficient Dynamic Scenes Processing Framework for Retinal Prosthesescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.