mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On LLM Wizards: Identifying Large Language Models' Behaviors for Wizard of Oz Experiments

arXiv 2407.08067 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2024cs.HC cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Wizard of Oz (WoZ) method is a widely adopted research approach where a human Wizard ``role-plays'' a not readily available technology and interacts with participants to elicit user behaviors and probe the design space. With the growing ability for modern large language models (LLMs) to role-play, one can apply LLMs as Wizards in WoZ experiments with better scalability and lower cost than the traditional approach. However, methodological guidance on responsibly applying LLMs in WoZ experiments and a systematic evaluation of LLMs' role-playing ability are lacking. Through two LLM-powered WoZ studies, we take the first step towards identifying an experiment lifecycle for researchers to safely integrate LLMs into WoZ experiments and interpret data generated from settings that involve Wizards role-played by LLMs. We also contribute a heuristic-based evaluation framework that allows the estimation of LLMs' role-playing ability in WoZ experiments and reveals LLMs' behavior patterns at scale.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2024.

Builds on

29 of 87 references.

References · 29

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  5. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  6. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  7. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
  8. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  9. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  10. 2022Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samplescited by 737
  11. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
  12. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
17 more
  1. 2022Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studiescited by 506
  2. 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 410
  3. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models at Evaluating Instruction Followingcited by 290
  4. 2023"Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letterscited by 196
  5. 2019Challenges in Building Intelligent Open-domain Dialog Systemscited by 147
  6. 2017Composite Task-Completion Dialogue Policy Learning via Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
  7. 2020Demographics Should Not Be the Reason of Toxicity: Mitigating Discrimination in Text Classifications with Instance Weightingcited by 41
  8. 2023Using In-Context Learning to Improve Dialogue Safetycited by 41
  9. 2023Instruction-following Evaluation through Verbalizer Manipulationcited by 30
  10. 2020Effects of Persuasive Dialogues: Testing Bot Identities and Inquiry Strategiescited by 29
  11. 2019Tell Me About Yourself: Using an AI-Powered Chatbot to Conduct Conversational Surveys with Open-ended Questionscited by 16
  12. 2018Understanding Chatbot-mediated Task Managementcited by 12
  13. 2021Designing Effective Interview Chatbots: Automatic Chatbot Profiling and Design Suggestion Generation for Chatbot Debuggingcited by 12
  14. 2022Seamlessly Integrating Factual Information and Social Content with Persuasive Dialoguecited by 11
  15. 2023Public Perceptions of Gender Bias in Large Language Models: Cases of ChatGPT and Erniecited by 8
  16. 2023Inform the uninformed: Improving Online Informed Consent Reading with an AI-Powered Chatbotcited by 5
  17. 2021Machine learning reveals how personalized climate communication can both succeed and backfirecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.