Analyzing Machine Learning Performance in a Hybrid Quantum Computing and HPC Environment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We explored the possible benefits of integrating quantum simulators in a "hybrid" quantum machine learning (QML) workflow that uses both classical and quantum computations in a high-performance computing (HPC) environment. Here, we used two Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility HPC systems, Andes (a commodity-type Linux cluster) and Frontier (an HPE Cray EX supercomputer), along with quantum computing simulators from PennyLane and IBMQ to evaluate a hybrid QML program -- using a "ground up" approach. Using 1 GPU on Frontier, we found ~56% and ~77% speedups when compared to using Frontier's CPU and a local, non-HPC system, respectively. Analyzing performance on a larger dataset using multiple threads, the Frontier GPUs performed ~92% and ~48% faster than the Andes and Frontier CPUs, respectively. More impressively, this is a ~226% speedup over a local, non-HPC system's runtime using the same simulator and number of threads. We hope that this proof of concept will motivate more intensive hybrid QC/HPC scaling studies in the future.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2024.
Builds on
5 of 32 references.
References · 5
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,223
- 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,488
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,284
- 2021Continental-Scale Building Detection from High Resolution Satellite Imagerycited by 50
Built on by
Not cited yet.