mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MDP Geometry, Normalization and Reward Balancing Solvers

arXiv 2407.06712 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2024cs.LG math.OCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a new geometric interpretation of Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with a natural normalization procedure that allows us to adjust the value function at each state without altering the advantage of any action with respect to any policy. This advantage-preserving transformation of the MDP motivates a class of algorithms which we call Reward Balancing, which solve MDPs by iterating through these transformations, until an approximately optimal policy can be trivially found. We provide a convergence analysis of several algorithms in this class, in particular showing that for MDPs for unknown transition probabilities we can improve upon state-of-the-art sample complexity results.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2024.

Builds on

10 of 34 references.

References · 10

  1. 2021Is Q-Learning Minimax Optimal? A Tight Sample Complexity Analysiscited by 89
  2. 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 74
  3. 2020The Value-Improvement Path: Towards Better Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
  4. 2019A Geometric Perspective on Optimal Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 54
  5. 2023The Blessing of Heterogeneity in Federated Q-Learning: Linear Speedup and Beyondcited by 34
  6. 2019The Value Function Polytope in Reinforcement Learningcited by 29
  7. 2021Sample and Communication-Efficient Decentralized Actor-Critic Algorithms with Finite-Time Analysiscited by 25
  8. 2020Towards Understanding Asynchronous Advantage Actor-critic: Convergence and Linear Speedupcited by 23
  9. 2020Finite-Sample Analysis of Stochastic Approximation Using Smooth Convex Envelopescited by 19
  10. 2013The Value Iteration Algorithm is Not Strongly Polynomial for Discounted Dynamic Programmingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.