Exploiting the equivalence between quantum neural networks and perceptrons
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum machine learning models based on parametrized quantum circuits, also called quantum neural networks (QNNs), are considered to be among the most promising candidates for applications on near-term quantum devices. Here we explore the expressivity and inductive bias of QNNs by exploiting an exact mapping from QNNs with inputs x to classical perceptrons acting on x otimes x (generalised to complex inputs). The simplicity of the perceptron architecture allows us to provide clear examples of the shortcomings of current QNN models, and the many barriers they face to becoming useful general-purpose learning algorithms. For example, a QNN with amplitude encoding cannot express the Boolean parity function for n≥ 3, which is but one of an exponential number of data structures that such a QNN is unable to express. Mapping a QNN to a classical perceptron simplifies training, allowing us to systematically study the inductive biases of other, more expressive embeddings on Boolean data. Several popular embeddings primarily produce an inductive bias towards functions with low class balance, reducing their generalisation performance compared to deep neural network architectures which exhibit much richer inductive biases. We explore two alternate strategies that move beyond standard QNNs. In the first, we use a QNN to help generate a classical DNN-inspired kernel. In the second we draw an analogy to the hierarchical structure of deep neural networks and construct a layered non-linear QNN that is provably fully expressive on Boolean data, while also exhibiting a richer inductive bias than simple QNNs. Finally, we discuss characteristics of the QNN literature that may obscure how hard it is to achieve quantum advantage over deep learning algorithms on classical data.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2024.
Builds on
37 of 80 references.
References · 37
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
- 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 624
- 2020The power of quantum neural networkscited by 377
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
- 2018Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networkscited by 314
- 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 270
25 more
- 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
- 2021Quantum advantage in learning from experimentscited by 186
- 2018Deep learning generalizes because the parameter-function map is biased towards simple functionscited by 180
- 2021Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateauscited by 180
- 2020Spectral Bias and Task-Model Alignment Explain Generalization in Kernel Regression and Infinitely Wide Neural Networkscited by 166
- 2020Finite Versus Infinite Neural Networks: an Empirical Studycited by 156
- 2021Fit without fear: remarkable mathematical phenomena of deep learning through the prism of interpolationcited by 130
- 2021QuantumNAS: Noise-Adaptive Search for Robust Quantum Circuitscited by 97
- 2021Generalization Error Rates in Kernel Regression: The Crossover from the Noiseless to Noisy Regimecited by 95
- 2021The Inductive Bias of Quantum Kernelscited by 90
- 2019Harnessing the Power of Infinitely Wide Deep Nets on Small-data Taskscited by 87
- 2024Better than classical? The subtle art of benchmarking quantum machine learning modelscited by 82
- 2020TensorFlow Quantum: A Software Framework for Quantum Machine Learningcited by 72
- 2022Simplicity Bias in Transformers and their Ability to Learn Sparse Boolean Functionscited by 68
- 2020Kernel Alignment Risk Estimator: Risk Prediction from Training Datacited by 54
- 2020Is SGD a Bayesian sampler? Well, almostcited by 50
- 2022Classical surrogates for quantum learning modelscited by 39
- 2020Generalization bounds for deep learningcited by 38
- 2022Bandwidth Enables Generalization in Quantum Kernel Modelscited by 32
- 2023Deep neural networks have an inbuilt Occam's razorcited by 28
- 2019Neural networks are a priori biased towards Boolean functions with low entropycited by 24
- 2022On establishing learning separations between classical and quantum machine learning with classical datacited by 15
- 2022Numerical evidence against advantage with quantum fidelity kernels on classical datacited by 11
- 2021Double-descent curves in neural networks: a new perspective using Gaussian processescited by 5
- 2024Do Quantum Neural Networks have Simplicity Bias?cited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.