mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Systematic Task Exploration with LLMs: A Study in Citation Text Generation

arXiv 2407.04046 ↗First posted 4 Jul 2024cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) bring unprecedented flexibility in defining and executing complex, creative natural language generation (NLG) tasks. Yet, this flexibility brings new challenges, as it introduces new degrees of freedom in formulating the task inputs and instructions and in evaluating model performance. To facilitate the exploration of creative NLG tasks, we propose a three-component research framework that consists of systematic input manipulation, reference data, and output measurement. We use this framework to explore citation text generation -- a popular scholarly NLP task that lacks consensus on the task definition and evaluation metric and has not yet been tackled within the LLM paradigm. Our results highlight the importance of systematically investigating both task instruction and input configuration when prompting LLMs, and reveal non-trivial relationships between different evaluation metrics used for citation text generation. Additional human generation and human evaluation experiments provide new qualitative insights into the task to guide future research in citation text generation. We make our code and data publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2024.

Builds on

36 of 77 references.

References · 36

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  5. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  6. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  8. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  9. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  10. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
  11. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,404
  12. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
24 more
  1. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,122
  2. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
  3. 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 402
  4. 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 265
  5. 2023PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Promptscited by 218
  6. 2022Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimationcited by 215
  7. 2023On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspectivecited by 208
  8. 2021Reframing Instructional Prompts to GPTk's Languagecited by 176
  9. 2022Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Textcited by 154
  10. 2019Structural Scaffolds for Citation Intent Classification in Scientific Publicationscited by 129
  11. 2020Multi-XScience: A Large-scale Dataset for Extreme Multi-document Summarization of Scientific Articlescited by 96
  12. 2023TELeR: A General Taxonomy of LLM Prompts for Benchmarking Complex Taskscited by 48
  13. 2023Did You Read the Instructions? Rethinking the Effectiveness of Task Definitions in Instruction Learningcited by 40
  14. 2023GPT4 is Slightly Helpful for Peer-Review Assistance: A Pilot Studycited by 40
  15. 2020Explaining Relationships Between Scientific Documentscited by 35
  16. 2022Robustness of Learning from Task Instructionscited by 34
  17. 2021MultiCite: Modeling realistic citations requires moving beyond the single-sentence single-label settingcited by 30
  18. 2022CiteBench: A benchmark for Scientific Citation Text Generationcited by 22
  19. 2022Target-aware Abstractive Related Work Generation with Contrastive Learningcited by 20
  20. 2022CORWA: A Citation-Oriented Related Work Annotation Datasetcited by 17
  21. 2023SciReviewGen: A Large-scale Dataset for Automatic Literature Review Generationcited by 17
  22. 2021Towards Generating Citation Sentences for Multiple References with Intent Controlcited by 9
  23. 2023On "Scientific Debt" in NLP: A Case for More Rigour in Language Model Pre-Training Researchcited by 7
  24. 2023SciLit: A Platform for Joint Scientific Literature Discovery, Summarization and Citation Generationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

8 papers.