mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Scoping Review of Active Learning Strategies and their Evaluation Environments for Entity Recognition Tasks

arXiv 2407.03895 ↗First posted 4 Jul 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We conducted a scoping review for active learning in the domain of natural language processing (NLP), which we summarize in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines as follows: Objective: Identify active learning strategies that were proposed for entity recognition and their evaluation environments (datasets, metrics, hardware, execution time). Design: We used Scopus and ACM as our search engines. We compared the results with two literature surveys to assess the search quality. We included peer-reviewed English publications introducing or comparing active learning strategies for entity recognition. Results: We analyzed 62 relevant papers and identified 106 active learning strategies. We grouped them into three categories: exploitation-based (60x), exploration-based (14x), and hybrid strategies (32x). We found that all studies used the F1-score as an evaluation metric. Information about hardware (6x) and execution time (13x) was only occasionally included. The 62 papers used 57 different datasets to evaluate their respective strategies. Most datasets contained newspaper articles or biomedical/medical data. Our analysis revealed that 26 out of 57 datasets are publicly accessible. Conclusion: Numerous active learning strategies have been identified, along with significant open questions that still need to be addressed. Researchers and practitioners face difficulties when making data-driven decisions about which active learning strategy to adopt. Conducting comprehensive empirical comparisons using the evaluation environment proposed in this study could help establish best practices in the domain.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 115 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2024.

Builds on

25 of 115 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,090
  5. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 554
  6. 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 409
  7. 2017Deep Active Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 108
  8. 2018Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Natural Language Processing: Results of a Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 90
  9. 2022A Comparative Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 89
  10. 2023Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and Toxicitycited by 89
  11. 2021On Statistical Bias In Active Learning: How and When To Fix Itcited by 75
  12. 2018OpenTag: Open Attribute Value Extraction from Product Profiles [Deep Learning, Active Learning, Named Entity Recognition]cited by 63
13 more
  1. 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processingcited by 40
  2. 2021Active Learning for Sequence Tagging with Deep Pre-trained Models and Bayesian Uncertainty Estimatescited by 39
  3. 2020Fair Active Learningcited by 30
  4. 2021skweak: Weak Supervision Made Easy for NLPcited by 17
  5. 2021A Survey on Cost Types, Interaction Schemes, and Annotator Performance Models in Selection Algorithms for Active Learning in Classificationcited by 17
  6. 2023D-CALM: A Dynamic Clustering-based Active Learning Approach for Mitigating Biascited by 12
  7. 2023Large Language Models are legal but they are not: Making the case for a powerful LegalLLMcited by 12
  8. 2019A Little Annotation does a Lot of Good: A Study in Bootstrapping Low-resource Named Entity Recognizerscited by 9
  9. 2022FAMIE: A Fast Active Learning Framework for Multilingual Information Extractioncited by 8
  10. 2022Jointly Learning Span Extraction and Sequence Labeling for Information Extraction from Business Documentscited by 4
  11. 2022On Efficiently Acquiring Annotations for Multilingual Modelscited by 3
  12. 2023ALE: A Simulation-Based Active Learning Evaluation Framework for the Parameter-Driven Comparison of Query Strategies for NLPcited by 2
  13. 2021Focusing on Potential Named Entities During Active Label Acquisitioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.