Protecting Deep Learning Model Copyrights with Adversarial Example-Free Reuse Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model reuse techniques can reduce the resource requirements for training high-performance deep neural networks (DNNs) by leveraging existing models. However, unauthorized reuse and replication of DNNs can lead to copyright infringement and economic loss to the model owner. This underscores the need to analyze the reuse relation between DNNs and develop copyright protection techniques to safeguard intellectual property rights. Existing white-box testing-based approaches cannot address the common heterogeneous reuse case where the model architecture is changed, and DNN fingerprinting approaches heavily rely on generating adversarial examples with good transferability, which is known to be challenging in the black-box setting. To bridge the gap, we propose NFARD, a Neuron Functionality Analysis-based Reuse Detector, which only requires normal test samples to detect reuse relations by measuring the models' differences on a newly proposed model characterization, i.e., neuron functionality (NF). A set of NF-based distance metrics is designed to make NFARD applicable to both white-box and black-box settings. Moreover, we devise a linear transformation method to handle heterogeneous reuse cases by constructing the optimal projection matrix for dimension consistency, significantly extending the application scope of NFARD. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first adversarial example-free method that exploits neuron functionality for DNN copyright protection. As a side contribution, we constructed a reuse detection benchmark named Reuse Zoo that covers various practical reuse techniques and popular datasets. Extensive evaluations on this comprehensive benchmark show that NFARD achieves F1 scores of 0.984 and 1.0 for detecting reuse relationships in black-box and white-box settings, respectively, while generating test suites 2 ~ 99 times faster than previous methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2024.
Builds on
29 of 63 references.
References · 29
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
- 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,548
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
- 2013Speech Recognition with Deep Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 666
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
17 more
- 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 334
- 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 318
- 2017A Survey of Model Compression and Acceleration for Deep Neural Networkscited by 298
- 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
- 2017Embedding Watermarks into Deep Neural Networkscited by 227
- 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 220
- 2018PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 159
- 2019Deep Neural Network Fingerprinting by Conferrable Adversarial Examplescited by 90
- 2019IPGuard: Protecting Intellectual Property of Deep Neural Networks via Fingerprinting the Classification Boundarycited by 68
- 2022Fingerprinting Deep Neural Networks Globally via Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 58
- 2019Defending Against Model Stealing Attacks with Adaptive Misinformationcited by 55
- 2021Copy, Right? A Testing Framework for Copyright Protection of Deep Learning Modelscited by 44
- 2016Compression of Neural Machine Translation Models via Pruningcited by 43
- 2021ModelDiff: Testing-Based DNN Similarity Comparison for Model Reuse Detectioncited by 33
- 2020Neural Network Laundering: Removing Black-Box Backdoor Watermarks from Deep Neural Networkscited by 24
- 2020ES Attack: Model Stealing against Deep Neural Networks without Data Hurdlescited by 24
- 2023FedRight: An Effective Model Copyright Protection for Federated Learningcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.