FedSat: A Statistical Aggregation Approach for Class Imbalanced Clients in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for privacy-preserving distributed machine learning, but faces challenges with heterogeneous data distributions across clients. This paper presents FedSat, a novel FL approach specifically designed to simultaneously handle three forms of data heterogeneity, namely label skewness, missing classes, and quantity skewness, by proposing a prediction-sensitive loss function and a prioritized-class based weighted aggregation scheme. While the prediction-sensitive loss function enhances model performance on minority classes, the prioritized-class based weighted aggregation scheme ensures client contributions are weighted based on both statistical significance and performance on critical classes. Extensive experiments across diverse data-heterogeneity settings demonstrate that FedSat significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, with an average improvement of 1.8% over the second-best method and 19.87% over the weakest-performing baseline. The approach also demonstrates faster convergence compared to existing methods. These results highlight FedSat's effectiveness in addressing the challenges of heterogeneous federated learning and its potential for real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2024.
Builds on
26 of 31 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
- 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 906
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 851
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 766
- 2021FedBN: Federated Learning on Non-IID Features via Local Batch Normalizationcited by 571
- 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Studycited by 568
- 2021Federated Learning Based on Dynamic Regularizationcited by 562
- 2021No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 241
- 2018Don't Use Large Mini-Batches, Use Local SGDcited by 202
14 more
- 2021Achieving Linear Speedup with Partial Worker Participation in Non-IID Federated Learningcited by 193
- 2022FedDC: Federated Learning with Non-IID Data via Local Drift Decoupling and Correctioncited by 181
- 2022ProxSkip: Yes! Local Gradient Steps Provably Lead to Communication Acceleration! Finally!cited by 134
- 2013Communication Efficient Distributed Optimization using an Approximate Newton-type Methodcited by 132
- 2022Federated Learning with Label Distribution Skew via Logits Calibrationcited by 109
- 2020FedDANE: A Federated Newton-Type Methodcited by 76
- 2022FedCorr: Multi-Stage Federated Learning for Label Noise Correctioncited by 61
- 2022FedAvg with Fine Tuning: Local Updates Lead to Representation Learningcited by 56
- 2022Federated Learning via Inexact ADMMcited by 44
- 2022On Convergence of FedProx: Local Dissimilarity Invariant Bounds, Non-smoothness and Beyondcited by 38
- 2022TCT: Convexifying Federated Learning using Bootstrapped Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 26
- 2023Efficient Federated Learning via Local Adaptive Amended Optimizer with Linear Speedupcited by 23
- 2022AdaBest: Minimizing Client Drift in Federated Learning via Adaptive Bias Estimationcited by 21
- 2021FedPAGE: A Fast Local Stochastic Gradient Method for Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.