mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Human Understanding of Paraphrase Types in Large Language Models

arXiv 2407.02302 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2024cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Paraphrases represent a human's intuitive ability to understand expressions presented in various different ways. Current paraphrase evaluations of language models primarily use binary approaches, offering limited interpretability of specific text changes. Atomic paraphrase types (APT) decompose paraphrases into different linguistic changes and offer a granular view of the flexibility in linguistic expression (e.g., a shift in syntax or vocabulary used). In this study, we assess the human preferences towards ChatGPT in generating English paraphrases with ten APTs and five prompting techniques. We introduce APTY (Atomic Paraphrase TYpes), a dataset of 800 sentence-level and word-level annotations by 15 annotators. The dataset also provides a human preference ranking of paraphrases with different types that can be used to fine-tune models with RLHF and DPO methods. Our results reveal that ChatGPT and a DPO-trained LLama 7B model can generate simple APTs, such as additions and deletions, but struggle with complex structures (e.g., subordination changes). This study contributes to understanding which aspects of paraphrasing language models have already succeeded at understanding and what remains elusive. In addition, we show how our curated datasets can be used to develop language models with specific linguistic capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 11 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2024.

Builds on

11 of 34 references.

References · 11

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  4. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
  5. 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
  6. 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 165
  7. 2021FLEX: Unifying Evaluation for Few-Shot NLPcited by 67
  8. 2021Generating Syntactically Controlled Paraphrases without Using Annotated Parallel Pairscited by 45
  9. 2022How Large Language Models are Transforming Machine-Paraphrased Plagiarismcited by 38
  10. 2024Paraphrase Types Elicit Prompt Engineering Capabilitiescited by 15
  11. 2022Paraphrase Identification with Deep Learning: A Review of Datasets and Methodscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Enhancing Paraphrase Type Generation: The Impact of DPO and RLHF Evaluated with Human-Ranked Data
  2. 2022Psychologically-informed chain-of-thought prompts for metaphor understanding in large language models
  3. 2022Novelty Controlled Paraphrase Generation with Retrieval Augmented Conditional Prompt Tuning
  4. 2025Flaw or Artifact? Rethinking Prompt Sensitivity in Evaluating LLMs
  5. 2025AdParaphrase v2.0: Generating Attractive Ad Texts Using a Preference-Annotated Paraphrase Dataset
  6. 2025RoParQ: Paraphrase-Aware Alignment of Large Language Models Towards Robustness to Paraphrased Questions
  7. 2026Fully Automated Identification of Lexical Alignment and Preference-Stage Shifts in Large Language Models
  8. 2024How often are errors in natural language reasoning due to paraphrastic variability?