Contribution Evaluation of Heterogeneous Participants in Federated Learning via Prototypical Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contribution evaluation in federated learning (FL) has become a pivotal research area due to its applicability across various domains, such as detecting low-quality datasets, enhancing model robustness, and designing incentive mechanisms. Existing contribution evaluation methods, which primarily rely on data volume, model similarity, and auxiliary test datasets, have shown success in diverse scenarios. However, their effectiveness often diminishes due to the heterogeneity of data distributions, presenting a significant challenge to their applicability. In response, this paper explores contribution evaluation in FL from an entirely new perspective of representation. In this work, we propose a new method for the contribution evaluation of heterogeneous participants in federated learning (FLCE), which introduces a novel indicator class contribution momentum to conduct refined contribution evaluation. Our core idea is the construction and application of the class contribution momentum indicator from individual, relative, and holistic perspectives, thereby achieving an effective and efficient contribution evaluation of heterogeneous participants without relying on an auxiliary test dataset. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our method in terms of fidelity, effectiveness, efficiency, and heterogeneity across various scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2024.
Builds on
26 of 50 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 762
- 2020Ditto: Fair and Robust Federated Learning Through Personalizationcited by 665
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
- 2021Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Studycited by 566
- 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 389
- 2021FedProto: Federated Prototype Learning across Heterogeneous Clientscited by 349
- 2016Why and When Can Deep -- but Not Shallow -- Networks Avoid the Curse of Dimensionality: a Reviewcited by 155
14 more
- 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
- 2022Federated Learning from Pre-Trained Models: A Contrastive Learning Approachcited by 141
- 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
- 2020Collaborative Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 95
- 2021Asynchronous Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Devices: A Surveycited by 93
- 2021GTG-Shapley: Efficient and Accurate Participant Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learningcited by 73
- 2022Tackling Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning with Class Prototypescited by 66
- 2021Federated Learning with Fair Averagingcited by 59
- 2021FedCCEA : A Practical Approach of Client Contribution Evaluation for Federated Learningcited by 14
- 2022Secure Shapley Value for Cross-Silo Federated Learning (Technical Report)cited by 13
- 2022PreFair: Privately Generating Justifiably Fair Synthetic Datacited by 13
- 2022PPA: Preference Profiling Attack Against Federated Learningcited by 8
- 2023Turning Privacy-preserving Mechanisms against Federated Learningcited by 8
- 2022FedMCSA: Personalized Federated Learning via Model Components Self-Attentioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.