mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gradient-based Class Weighting for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Dense Prediction Visual Tasks

arXiv 2407.01327 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA), where models are trained on source data (e.g., synthetic) and adapted to target data (e.g., real-world) without target annotations, addressing the challenge of significant class imbalance remains an open issue. Despite considerable progress in bridging the domain gap, existing methods often experience performance degradation when confronted with highly imbalanced dense prediction visual tasks like semantic and panoptic segmentation. This discrepancy becomes especially pronounced due to the lack of equivalent priors between the source and target domains, turning class imbalanced techniques used for other areas (e.g., image classification) ineffective in UDA scenarios. This paper proposes a class-imbalance mitigation strategy that incorporates class-weights into the UDA learning losses, but with the novelty of estimating these weights dynamically through the loss gradient, defining a Gradient-based class weighting (GBW) learning. GBW naturally increases the contribution of classes whose learning is hindered by large-represented classes, and has the advantage of being able to automatically and quickly adapt to the iteration training outcomes, avoiding explicitly curricular learning patterns common in loss-weighing strategies. Extensive experimentation validates the effectiveness of GBW across architectures (convolutional and transformer), UDA strategies (adversarial, self-training and entropy minimization), tasks (semantic and panoptic segmentation), and datasets (GTA and Synthia). Analysing the source of advantage, GBW consistently increases the recall of low represented classes.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2024.

Builds on

38 of 77 references.

References · 38

  1. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  2. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,923
  3. 2016Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Gamescited by 816
  4. 2018Panoptic Segmentationcited by 796
  5. 2018ADVENT: Adversarial Entropy Minimization for Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 623
  6. 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 614
  7. 2018Learning to Adapt Structured Output Space for Semantic Segmentationcited by 584
  8. 2019Segmentation Transformer: Object-Contextual Representations for Semantic Segmentationcited by 573
  9. 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
  10. 2021DAFormer: Improving Network Architectures and Training Strategies for Domain-Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 299
  11. 2017Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3D fully convolutional deep networkscited by 228
  12. 2020DACS: Domain Adaptation via Cross-domain Mixed Samplingcited by 226
26 more
  1. 2022MIC: Masked Image Consistency for Context-Enhanced Domain Adaptationcited by 176
  2. 2015Cost Sensitive Learning of Deep Feature Representations from Imbalanced Datacited by 167
  3. 2022HRDA: Context-Aware High-Resolution Domain-Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 163
  4. 2017Mind the Class Weight Bias: Weighted Maximum Mean Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 151
  5. 2019Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation with Maximum Squares Losscited by 138
  6. 2021Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Pixel-Level Contrastive Learning from a Class-wise Memory Bankcited by 125
  7. 2017ROAD: Reality Oriented Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation of Urban Scenescited by 95
  8. 2021Unified Focal loss: Generalising Dice and cross entropy-based losses to handle class imbalanced medical image segmentationcited by 88
  9. 2020Map-Guided Curriculum Domain Adaptation and Uncertainty-Aware Evaluation for Semantic Nighttime Image Segmentationcited by 86
  10. 2019Transfer Adaptation Learning: A Decade Surveycited by 52
  11. 2021DSP: Dual Soft-Paste for Unsupervised Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 45
  12. 2021Cross-View Regularization for Domain Adaptive Panoptic Segmentationcited by 41
  13. 2023Upcycling Models under Domain and Category Shiftcited by 29
  14. 2023Survey on Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation for Visual Perception in Automated Drivingcited by 29
  15. 2020ESL: Entropy-guided Self-supervised Learning for Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 27
  16. 2023DiGA: Distil to Generalize and then Adapt for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 19
  17. 2023Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via Domain-Adaptive Diffusioncited by 19
  18. 2023EDAPS: Enhanced Domain-Adaptive Panoptic Segmentationcited by 17
  19. 2021Style Mixing and Patchwise Prototypical Matching for One-Shot Unsupervised Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 15
  20. 2023Contrast, Stylize and Adapt: Unsupervised Contrastive Learning Framework for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 11
  21. 2023Black-box Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Bi-directional Atkinson-Shiffrin Memorycited by 11
  22. 2022UniDAformer: Unified Domain Adaptive Panoptic Segmentation Transformer via Hierarchical Mask Calibrationcited by 8
  23. 2022BP-Triplet Net for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: A Bayesian Perspectivecited by 7
  24. 2023Soft labelling for semantic segmentation: Bringing coherence to label down-samplingcited by 5
  25. 2022Exploring Consistency in Cross-Domain Transformer for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 4
  26. 2024DDF: A Novel Dual-Domain Image Fusion Strategy for Remote Sensing Image Semantic Segmentation with Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

3 papers.