Cooperative Advisory Residual Policies for Congestion Mitigation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fleets of autonomous vehicles can mitigate traffic congestion through simple actions, thus improving many socioeconomic factors such as commute time and gas costs. However, these approaches are limited in practice as they assume precise control over autonomous vehicle fleets, incur extensive installation costs for a centralized sensor ecosystem, and also fail to account for uncertainty in driver behavior. To this end, we develop a class of learned residual policies that can be used in cooperative advisory systems and only require the use of a single vehicle with a human driver. Our policies advise drivers to behave in ways that mitigate traffic congestion while accounting for diverse driver behaviors, particularly drivers' reactions to instructions, to provide an improved user experience. To realize such policies, we introduce an improved reward function that explicitly addresses congestion mitigation and driver attitudes to advice. We show that our residual policies can be personalized by conditioning them on an inferred driver trait that is learned in an unsupervised manner with a variational autoencoder. Our policies are trained in simulation with our novel instruction adherence driver model, and evaluated in simulation and through a user study (N=16) to capture the sentiments of human drivers. Our results show that our approaches successfully mitigate congestion while adapting to different driver behaviors, with up to 20% and 40% improvement as measured by a combination metric of speed and deviations in speed across time over baselines in our simulation tests and user study, respectively. Our user study further shows that our policies are human-compatible and personalize to drivers.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2024.
Builds on
21 of 86 references.
References · 21
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
- 2018Residual Reinforcement Learning for Robot Controlcited by 274
- 2018Residual Policy Learningcited by 164
- 2018Interactive Supercomputing on 40,000 Cores for Machine Learning and Data Analysiscited by 110
- 2017Flow: A Modular Learning Framework for Mixed Autonomy Trafficcited by 73
- 2017Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: Field experimentscited by 45
- 2018Augmenting Physical Simulators with Stochastic Neural Networks: Case Study of Planar Pushing and Bouncingcited by 36
- 2017Simultaneous Policy Learning and Latent State Inference for Imitating Driver Behaviorcited by 16
- 2021Reinforcement Learning for Mixed Autonomy Intersectionscited by 16
- 2022Unified Automatic Control of Vehicular Systems with Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
- 2020A Taxonomy and Review of Algorithms for Modeling and Predicting Human Driver Behaviorcited by 9
9 more
- 2022Learning Eco-Driving Strategies at Signalized Intersectionscited by 9
- 2021Learning to Navigate Intersections with Unsupervised Driver Trait Inferencecited by 8
- 2023Temporal Transfer Learning for Traffic Optimization with Coarse-grained Advisory Autonomycited by 6
- 2023Cooperative Driving for Speed Harmonization in Mixed-Traffic Environmentscited by 4
- 2023PeRP: Personalized Residual Policies For Congestion Mitigation Through Co-operative Advisory Systemscited by 4
- 2021CAN Coach: Vehicular Control through Human Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 2
- 2023Integrated Analysis of Coarse-Grained Guidance for Traffic Flow Stabilitycited by 2
- 2023Enabling Mixed Autonomy Traffic Controlcited by 2
- 2023Mitigation of stop-and-go traffic waves with intelligent vehicles at low market penetration ratescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.