mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LoPT: Low-Rank Prompt Tuning for Parameter Efficient Language Models

arXiv 2406.19486 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.ETcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In prompt tuning, a prefix or suffix text is added to the prompt, and the embeddings (soft prompts) or token indices (hard prompts) of the prefix/suffix are optimized to gain more control over language models for specific tasks. This approach eliminates the need for hand-crafted prompt engineering or explicit model fine-tuning. Prompt tuning is significantly more parameter-efficient than model fine-tuning, as it involves optimizing partial inputs of language models to produce desired outputs. In this work, we aim to further reduce the amount of trainable parameters required for a language model to perform well on specific tasks. We propose Low-rank Prompt Tuning (LoPT), a low-rank model for prompts that achieves efficient prompt optimization. The proposed method demonstrates similar outcomes to full parameter prompt tuning while reducing the number of trainable parameters by a factor of 5. It also provides promising results compared to the state-of-the-art methods that would require 10 to 20 times more parameters.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2024.

Builds on

23 of 34 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  7. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  8. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  9. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  10. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  11. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  12. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
11 more
  1. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
  2. 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 896
  3. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
  4. 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 370
  5. 2023Hard Prompts Made Easy: Gradient-Based Discrete Optimization for Prompt Tuning and Discoverycited by 329
  6. 2022LST: Ladder Side-Tuning for Parameter and Memory Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 228
  7. 2021OpenPrompt: An Open-source Framework for Prompt-learningcited by 148
  8. 2023Multitask Prompt Tuning Enables Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 115
  9. 2022ATTEMPT: Parameter-Efficient Multi-task Tuning via Attentional Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 85
  10. 2021Prompt Waywardness: The Curious Case of Discretized Interpretation of Continuous Promptscited by 64
  11. 2022Toward Human Readable Prompt Tuning: Kubrick's The Shining is a good movie, and a good prompt too?cited by 49

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.