mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

QBI: Quantile-Based Bias Initialization for Efficient Private Data Reconstruction in Federated Learning

arXiv 2406.18745 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning enables the training of machine learning models on distributed data without compromising user privacy, as data remains on personal devices and only model updates, such as gradients, are shared with a central coordinator. However, recent research has shown that the central entity can perfectly reconstruct private data from shared model updates by maliciously initializing the model's parameters. In this paper, we propose QBI, a novel bias initialization method that significantly enhances reconstruction capabilities. This is accomplished by directly solving for bias values yielding sparse activation patterns. Further, we propose PAIRS, an algorithm that builds on QBI. PAIRS can be deployed when a separate dataset from the target domain is available to further increase the percentage of data that can be fully recovered. Measured by the percentage of samples that can be perfectly reconstructed from batches of various sizes, our approach achieves significant improvements over previous methods with gains of up to 50% on ImageNet and up to 60% on the IMDB sentiment analysis text dataset. Furthermore, we establish theoretical limits for attacks leveraging stochastic gradient sparsity, providing a foundation for understanding the fundamental constraints of these attacks. We empirically assess these limits using synthetic datasets. Finally, we propose and evaluate AGGP, a defensive framework designed to prevent gradient sparsity attacks, contributing to the development of more secure and private federated learning systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2024.

Builds on

16 of 30 references.

References · 16

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  3. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  4. 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
  5. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
  6. 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 367
  7. 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 320
  8. 2018Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learningcited by 242
  9. 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 126
  10. 2021Robbing the Fed: Directly Obtaining Private Data in Federated Learning with Modified Modelscited by 106
  11. 2022Fishing for User Data in Large-Batch Federated Learning via Gradient Magnificationcited by 72
  12. 2021Eluding Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Model Inconsistencycited by 66
4 more
  1. 2021Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacy: Trade-offs between Privacy, Utility, and Communicationcited by 38
  2. 2021Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Federated Learning Framework for On-device Anomaly Data Detectioncited by 19
  3. 2023Reconstructing Individual Data Points in Federated Learning Hardened with Differential Privacy and Secure Aggregationcited by 16
  4. 2023Hiding in Plain Sight: Disguising Data Stealing Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.