Learning to Correct for QA Reasoning with Black-box LLMs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
An open challenge in recent machine learning is about how to improve the reasoning capability of large language models (LLMs) in a black-box setting, i.e., without access to detailed information such as output token probabilities. Existing approaches either rely on accessibility (which is often unrealistic) or involve significantly increased train- and inference-time costs. This paper addresses those limitations or shortcomings by proposing a novel approach, namely CoBB (Correct for improving QA reasoning of Black-Box LLMs). It uses a trained adaptation model to perform a seq2seq mapping from the often-imperfect reasonings of the original black-box LLM to the correct or improved reasonings. Specifically, the adaptation model is initialized with a relatively small open-source LLM and adapted over a collection of sub-sampled training pairs. To select the representative pairs of correct and incorrect reasonings, we formulated the dataset construction as an optimization problem that minimizes the statistical divergence between the sampled subset and the entire collection, and solved it via a genetic algorithm. We then train the adaptation model over the sampled pairs by contrasting the likelihoods of correct and incorrect reasonings. Our experimental results demonstrate that CoBB significantly improves reasoning accuracy across various QA benchmarks, compared to the best-performing adaptation baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2024.
Builds on
17 of 56 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 16
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,139
- 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
- 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 916
- 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 872
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
- 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 437
- 2023Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Modelscited by 384
- 2023Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 302
4 more
- 2024Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correctcited by 98
- 2024Democratizing Large Language Models via Personalized Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningcited by 90
- 2024Tuning Language Models by Proxycited by 89
- 2024Bias Mitigation in Fine-tuning Pre-trained Models for Enhanced Fairness and Efficiencycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024What's Wrong? Refining Meeting Summaries with LLM Feedbackcited by 8
- 2026When Agents Fail: A Comprehensive Study of Bugs in LLM Agents with Automated Labelingcited by 6
- 2025Question Answering with LLMs and Learning from Answer Setscited by 4
- 2025DICE: Structured Reasoning in LLMs through SLM-Guided Chain-of-Thought Correctioncited by 2
- 2024Evolution of Thought: Diverse and High-Quality Reasoning via Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Probing Cultural Awareness in LLMs: A Case Study of Cross-Culture Aesthetic Stylisticscited by 0
- 2026Probing Cultural Awareness in LLMs: A Case Study of Cross-Culture Aesthetic Stylistics26 May 2026
- 2026When Agents Fail: A Comprehensive Study of Bugs in LLM Agents with Automated Labeling21 Jan 2026
- 2025DICE: Structured Reasoning in LLMs through SLM-Guided Chain-of-Thought Correction10 Oct 2025
- 2025Question Answering with LLMs and Learning from Answer Sets20 Sep 2025
- 2024Evolution of Thought: Diverse and High-Quality Reasoning via Multi-Objective Optimization24 Nov 2024
- 2024What's Wrong? Refining Meeting Summaries with LLM Feedback16 Jul 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Sample Smart, Not Hard: Correctness-First Decoding for Better Reasoning in LLMs
- 2025HEFT: A Coarse-to-Fine Hierarchy for Enhancing the Efficiency and Accuracy of Language Model Reasoning
- 2026Query-Conditioned Test-Time Self-Training for Large Language Models
- 2025LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Models
- 2023Let's Sample Step by Step: Adaptive-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning and Coding with LLMs
- 2025DeepDistill: Enhancing LLM Reasoning Capabilities via Large-Scale Difficulty-Graded Data Training
- 2025Rectifying Belief Space via Unlearning to Harness LLMs' Reasoning
- 2024Language Models are Hidden Reasoners: Unlocking Latent Reasoning Capabilities via Self-Rewarding