mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Delving into the Utilisation of ChatGPT in Scientific Publications in Astronomy

arXiv 2406.17324 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2024cs.CL astro-ph.IM cs.DLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Rapid progress in the capabilities of machine learning approaches in natural language processing has culminated in the rise of large language models over the last two years. Recent works have shown unprecedented adoption of these for academic writing, especially in some fields, but their pervasiveness in astronomy has not been studied sufficiently. To remedy this, we extract words that ChatGPT uses more often than humans when generating academic text and search a total of 1 million articles for them. This way, we assess the frequency of word occurrence in published works in astronomy tracked by the NASA Astrophysics Data System since 2000. We then perform a statistical analysis of the occurrences. We identify a list of words favoured by ChatGPT and find a statistically significant increase for these words against a control group in 2024, which matches the trend in other disciplines. These results suggest a widespread adoption of these models in the writing of astronomy papers. We encourage organisations, publishers, and researchers to work together to identify ethical and pragmatic guidelines to maximise the benefits of these systems while maintaining scientific rigour.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2024.

Builds on

17 of 37 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
  4. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 386
  5. 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 356
  6. 2024Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviewscited by 164
  7. 2024Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Paperscited by 118
  8. 2024Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabularycited by 78
  9. 2023AstroLLaMA: Towards Specialized Foundation Models in Astronomycited by 41
  10. 2023Fighting Fire with Fire: Can ChatGPT Detect AI-generated Text?cited by 39
  11. 2023Differentiate ChatGPT-generated and Human-written Medical Textscited by 26
  12. 2024ChatGPT "contamination": estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literaturecited by 26
5 more
  1. 2024Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?cited by 26
  2. 2023Friend or Foe? Exploring the Implications of Large Language Models on the Science Systemcited by 16
  3. 2024Towards the relationship between AIGC in manuscript writing and author profiles: evidence from preprints in LLMscited by 14
  4. 2024AstroLLaMA-Chat: Scaling AstroLLaMA with Conversational and Diverse Datasetscited by 13
  5. 2015ADS: The Next Generation Search Platformcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

7 papers.