TabularMark: Watermarking Tabular Datasets for Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Watermarking is broadly utilized to protect ownership of shared data while preserving data utility. However, existing watermarking methods for tabular datasets fall short on the desired properties (detectability, non-intrusiveness, and robustness) and only preserve data utility from the perspective of data statistics, ignoring the performance of downstream ML models trained on the datasets. Can we watermark tabular datasets without significantly compromising their utility for training ML models while preventing attackers from training usable ML models on attacked datasets? In this paper, we propose a hypothesis testing-based watermarking scheme, TabularMark. Data noise partitioning is utilized for data perturbation during embedding, which is adaptable for numerical and categorical attributes while preserving the data utility. For detection, a custom-threshold one proportion z-test is employed, which can reliably determine the presence of the watermark. Experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate the superiority of TabularMark in detectability, non-intrusiveness, and robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2024.
Builds on
12 of 56 references.
References · 12
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
- 2022Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generatorscited by 290
- 2018Differentially Private Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 235
- 2020Deep Learning for Financial Applications : A Surveycited by 90
- 2017HoloClean: Holistic Data Repairs with Probabilistic Inferencecited by 79
- 2023Revisiting Personalized Federated Learning: Robustness Against Backdoor Attackscited by 16
- 2020An Automated and Robust Image Watermarking Scheme Based on Deep Neural Networkscited by 15
- 2018A Comprehensive Survey of Watermarking Relational Databases Researchcited by 4
- 2023A Somewhat Robust Image Watermark against Diffusion-based Editing Modelscited by 4
- 2020Predicting Future Sales of Retail Products using Machine Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2025ArtistAuditor: Auditing Artist Style Pirate in Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 5
- 2026Watermarking LLM Agent Trajectoriescited by 3
- 2026Towards Robust Content Watermarking Against Removal and Forgery Attackscited by 2
- 2024Watermarking Generative Categorical Datacited by 0
- 2025MUSE: Model-Agnostic Tabular Watermarking via Multi-Sample Selectioncited by 0
- 2025Robust Spectral Watermark for Synthetic Tabular Datacited by 0
- 2025Where is the Watermark? Interpretable Watermark Detection at the Block Levelcited by 0
- 2026RaMark: Radioactive Watermarking for Generated Tabular Datacited by 0
- 2026RaMark: Radioactive Watermarking for Generated Tabular Data10 Jul 2026
- 2026Towards Robust Content Watermarking Against Removal and Forgery Attacks8 Apr 2026
- 2026Watermarking LLM Agent Trajectories21 Feb 2026
- 2025Where is the Watermark? Interpretable Watermark Detection at the Block Level17 Dec 2025
- 2025Robust Spectral Watermark for Synthetic Tabular Data26 Nov 2025
- 2025MUSE: Model-Agnostic Tabular Watermarking via Multi-Sample Selection30 May 2025
- 2025ArtistAuditor: Auditing Artist Style Pirate in Text-to-Image Generation Models17 Apr 2025
- 2024Watermarking Generative Categorical Data16 Nov 2024