Defending Against Sophisticated Poisoning Attacks with RL-based Aggregation in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning is highly susceptible to model poisoning attacks, especially those meticulously crafted for servers. Traditional defense methods mainly focus on updating assessments or robust aggregation against manually crafted myopic attacks. When facing advanced attacks, their defense stability is notably insufficient. Therefore, it is imperative to develop adaptive defenses against such advanced poisoning attacks. We find that benign clients exhibit significantly higher data distribution stability than malicious clients in federated learning in both CV and NLP tasks. Therefore, the malicious clients can be recognized by observing the stability of their data distribution. In this paper, we propose AdaAggRL, an RL-based Adaptive Aggregation method, to defend against sophisticated poisoning attacks. Specifically, we first utilize distribution learning to simulate the clients' data distributions. Then, we use the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to calculate the pairwise similarity of the current local model data distribution, its historical data distribution, and global model data distribution. Finally, we use policy learning to adaptively determine the aggregation weights based on the above similarities. Experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed defense model significantly outperforms widely adopted defense models for sophisticated attacks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2024.
Builds on
25 of 41 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 707
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
- 2020MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimizationcited by 630
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
- 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 346
13 more
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
- 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 285
- 2019Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?cited by 250
- 2021Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 247
- 2018Algorithmic Framework for Model-based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Theoretical Guaranteescited by 138
- 2019Fall of Empires: Breaking Byzantine-tolerant SGD by Inner Product Manipulationcited by 136
- 2019Maximum Mean Discrepancy Gradient Flowcited by 123
- 2022FLDetector: Defending Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Detecting Malicious Clientscited by 119
- 2021Back to the Drawing Board: A Critical Evaluation of Poisoning Attacks on Production Federated Learningcited by 116
- 2020Adaptive Reward-Poisoning Attacks against Reinforcement Learningcited by 86
- 2020Differentially Private Secure Multi-Party Computation for Federated Learning in Financial Applicationscited by 58
- 2019DETOX: A Redundancy-based Framework for Faster and More Robust Gradient Aggregationcited by 44
- 2023FedDefender: Client-Side Attack-Tolerant Federated Learningcited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.