DIRAS: Efficient LLM Annotation of Document Relevance in Retrieval Augmented Generation
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG pipeline design and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) is widely employed to ground responses to queries on domain-specific documents. But do RAG implementations leave out important information when answering queries that need an integrated analysis of information (e.g., Tell me good news in the stock market today.)? To address these concerns, RAG developers need to annotate information retrieval (IR) data for their domain of interest, which is challenging because (1) domain-specific queries usually need nuanced definitions of relevance beyond shallow semantic relevance; and (2) human or GPT-4 annotation is costly and cannot cover all (query, document) pairs (i.e., annotation selection bias), thus harming the effectiveness in evaluating IR recall. To address these challenges, we propose DIRAS (Domain-specific Information Retrieval Annotation with Scalability), a manual-annotation-free schema that fine-tunes open-sourced LLMs to consider nuanced relevance definition and annotate (partial) relevance labels with calibrated relevance scores. Extensive evaluation shows that DIRAS enables smaller (8B) LLMs to achieve GPT-4-level performance on annotating and ranking unseen (query, document) pairs, and is helpful for real-world RAG development. All code, LLM generations, and human annotations can be found in urlhttps://github.com/EdisonNi-hku/DIRAS.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 18 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2024.
Builds on
18 of 66 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024The Power of Noise: Redefining Retrieval for RAG Systems26 Jan
- 2023ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems16 Nov
Other references · 16
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 788
- 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 584
- 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 567
- 2018Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-Powered Conversational agentscited by 530
- 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 302
- 2023RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 272
- 2022ASQA: Factoid Questions Meet Long-Form Answerscited by 231
- 2023RankZephyr: Effective and Robust Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking is a Breeze!cited by 151
4 more
- 2023Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferencescited by 129
- 2024Enhancing Noise Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Language Models with Adaptive Adversarial Trainingcited by 88
- 2023CHATREPORT: Democratizing Sustainability Disclosure Analysis through LLM-based Toolscited by 29
- 2024AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotatorscited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Likert or Not: LLM Absolute Relevance Judgments on Fine-Grained Ordinal Scalescited by 2
- 2026Completing Missing Annotation: Multi-Agent Debate for Accurate and Scalable Relevant Assessment for IR Benchmarkscited by 1
- 2025Which Programming Language and Model Work Best With LLM-as-a-Judge For Code Retrieval?cited by 0
- 2026Completing Missing Annotation: Multi-Agent Debate for Accurate and Scalable Relevant Assessment for IR Benchmarks6 Feb 2026
- 2025Which Programming Language and Model Work Best With LLM-as-a-Judge For Code Retrieval?30 Sep 2025
- 2025Likert or Not: LLM Absolute Relevance Judgments on Fine-Grained Ordinal Scales25 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Domain-Specific Question Answering: A Case Study on Pittsburgh and CMU
- 2025Utility-Focused LLM Annotation for Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation
- 2025mmRAG: A Modular Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation over Text, Tables, and Knowledge Graphs
- 2026Beyond Relevance: Utility-Centric Retrieval in the LLM Era
- 2025A Systematic Review of Key Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Systems: Progress, Gaps, and Future Directions
- 2024Evaluating Retrieval Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2024DR-RAG: Applying Dynamic Document Relevance to Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Question-Answering