Communication-Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Decentralized Meta-Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Distributed learning, which does not require gathering training data in a central location, has become increasingly important in the big-data era. In particular, random-walk-based decentralized algorithms are flexible in that they do not need a central server trusted by all clients and do not require all clients to be active in all iterations. However, existing distributed learning algorithms assume that all learning clients share the same task. In this paper, we consider the more difficult meta-learning setting, in which different clients perform different (but related) tasks with limited training data. To reduce communication cost and allow better privacy protection, we propose LoDMeta (Local Decentralized Meta-learning) with the use of local auxiliary optimization parameters and random perturbations on the model parameter. Theoretical results are provided on both convergence and privacy analysis. Empirical results on a number of few-shot learning data sets demonstrate that LoDMeta has similar meta-learning accuracy as centralized meta-learning algorithms, but does not require gathering data from each client and is able to better protect data privacy for each client.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2024.
Builds on
31 of 54 references.
References · 31
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,003
- 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2021Exploiting Shared Representations for Personalized Federated Learningcited by 537
- 2019Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysiscited by 528
- 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 361
- 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
- 2019Meta-Dataset: A Dataset of Datasets for Learning to Learn from Few Examplescited by 312
- 2020AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed Gradientscited by 282
- 2019On the Convergence Theory of Gradient-Based Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 132
19 more
- 2022Federated Learning with Partial Model Personalizationcited by 114
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 97
- 2022Decentralized Training of Foundation Models in Heterogeneous Environmentscited by 87
- 2021Federated Reconstruction: Partially Local Federated Learningcited by 78
- 2019Hierarchically Structured Meta-learningcited by 67
- 2020Optimal Complexity in Decentralized Trainingcited by 59
- 2021Personalized Federated Learning through Local Memorizationcited by 57
- 2021Bootstrapped Meta-Learningcited by 45
- 2020Adaptive Inertia: Disentangling the Effects of Adaptive Learning Rate and Momentumcited by 40
- 2021DecentLaM: Decentralized Momentum SGD for Large-batch Deep Trainingcited by 40
- 2022Private Adaptive Optimization with Side Informationcited by 38
- 2022Decentralized Gossip-Based Stochastic Bilevel Optimization over Communication Networkscited by 32
- 2018Walkman: A Communication-Efficient Random-Walk Algorithm for Decentralized Optimizationcited by 30
- 2020Privacy Amplification by Decentralizationcited by 28
- 2022Muffliato: Peer-to-Peer Privacy Amplification for Decentralized Optimization and Averagingcited by 27
- 2020Dif-MAML: Decentralized Multi-Agent Meta-Learningcited by 26
- 2022Decentralized Stochastic Bilevel Optimization with Improved per-Iteration Complexitycited by 21
- 2022Differentially Private Adaptive Optimization with Delayed Preconditionerscited by 18
- 2023SimFBO: Towards Simple, Flexible and Communication-efficient Federated Bilevel Learningcited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.