mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Class-specific Data Augmentation for Plant Stress Classification

arXiv 2406.13081 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data augmentation is a powerful tool for improving deep learning-based image classifiers for plant stress identification and classification. However, selecting an effective set of augmentations from a large pool of candidates remains a key challenge, particularly in imbalanced and confounding datasets. We propose an approach for automated class-specific data augmentation using a genetic algorithm. We demonstrate the utility of our approach on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] stress classification where symptoms are observed on leaves; a particularly challenging problem due to confounding classes in the dataset. Our approach yields substantial performance, achieving a mean-per-class accuracy of 97.61% and an overall accuracy of 98% on the soybean leaf stress dataset. Our method significantly improves the accuracy of the most challenging classes, with notable enhancements from 83.01% to 88.89% and from 85.71% to 94.05%, respectively. A key observation we make in this study is that high-performing augmentation strategies can be identified in a computationally efficient manner. We fine-tune only the linear layer of the baseline model with different augmentations, thereby reducing the computational burden associated with training classifiers from scratch for each augmentation policy while achieving exceptional performance. This research represents an advancement in automated data augmentation strategies for plant stress classification, particularly in the context of confounding datasets. Our findings contribute to the growing body of research in tailored augmentation techniques and their potential impact on disease management strategies, crop yields, and global food security. The proposed approach holds the potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of deep learning-based tools for managing plant stresses in agriculture.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2024.

Builds on

19 of 57 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,162
  4. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
  5. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 730
  6. 2019AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Artcited by 390
  7. 2017The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learningcited by 370
  8. 2019Fast AutoAugmentcited by 243
  9. 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 194
  10. 2018Deep learning in agriculture: A surveycited by 160
  11. 2019Population Based Augmentation: Efficient Learning of Augmentation Policy Schedulescited by 154
  12. 2019Learning Data Augmentation Strategies for Object Detectioncited by 139
7 more
  1. 2022The Effects of Regularization and Data Augmentation are Class Dependentcited by 67
  2. 2019From GAN to WGANcited by 34
  3. 2021PyGAD: An Intuitive Genetic Algorithm Python Librarycited by 25
  4. 2015Dreaming More Data: Class-dependent Distributions over Diffeomorphisms for Learned Data Augmentationcited by 24
  5. 2021CADDA: Class-wise Automatic Differentiable Data Augmentation for EEG Signalscited by 22
  6. 2020LeafGAN: An Effective Data Augmentation Method for Practical Plant Disease Diagnosiscited by 18
  7. 2023SLACK: Stable Learning of Augmentations with Cold-start and KL regularizationcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.