mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Applying Ensemble Methods to Model-Agnostic Machine-Generated Text Detection

arXiv 2406.12570 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we study the problem of detecting machine-generated text when the large language model (LLM) it is possibly derived from is unknown. We do so by apply ensembling methods to the outputs from DetectGPT classifiers (Mitchell et al. 2023), a zero-shot model for machine-generated text detection which is highly accurate when the generative (or base) language model is the same as the discriminative (or scoring) language model. We find that simple summary statistics of DetectGPT sub-model outputs yield an AUROC of 0.73 (relative to 0.61) while retaining its zero-shot nature, and that supervised learning methods sharply boost the accuracy to an AUROC of 0.94 but require a training dataset. This suggests the possibility of further generalisation to create a highly-accurate, model-agnostic machine-generated text detector.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2024.

Builds on

6 of 14 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
  3. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  4. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  5. 2018Deep Neural Networks for Bot Detectioncited by 37
  6. 2023To ChatGPT, or not to ChatGPT: That is the question!cited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.