mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Really Unlearned? Verifying Machine Unlearning via Influential Sample Pairs

arXiv 2406.10953 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2024cs.CRcited by 5

On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine unlearning enables pre-trained models to eliminate the effects of partial training samples. Previous research has mainly focused on proposing efficient unlearning strategies. However, the verification of machine unlearning, or in other words, how to guarantee that a sample has been successfully unlearned, has been overlooked for a long time. Existing verification schemes typically rely on machine learning attack techniques, such as backdoor or membership inference attacks. As these techniques are not formally designed for verification, they are easily bypassed when an untrustworthy MLaaS undergoes rapid fine-tuning to merely meet the verification conditions, rather than executing real unlearning. In this paper, we propose a formal verification scheme, IndirectVerify, to determine whether unlearning requests have been successfully executed. We design influential sample pairs: one referred to as trigger samples and the other as reaction samples. Users send unlearning requests regarding trigger samples and use reaction samples to verify if the unlearning operation has been successfully carried out. We propose a perturbation-based scheme to generate those influential sample pairs. The objective is to perturb only a small fraction of trigger samples, leading to the reclassification of reaction samples. This indirect influence will be used for our verification purposes. In contrast to existing schemes that employ the same samples for all processes, our scheme, IndirectVerify, provides enhanced robustness, making it less susceptible to bypassing processes.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2024.

Builds on

22 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Proof of Unlearning: Definitions and Instantiation20 Oct
  2. 2021On the Necessity of Auditable Algorithmic Definitions for Machine Unlearning22 Oct
  3. 2021Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning4 Mar

Other references · 19

  1. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  2. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
  3. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 618
  4. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 535
  5. 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 321
  6. 2020Amnesiac Machine Learningcited by 319
  7. 2020Forgetting Outside the Box: Scrubbing Deep Networks of Information Accessible from Input-Output Observationscited by 180
  8. 2020Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient Matchingcited by 163
  9. 2020Mixed-Privacy Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 163
  10. 2020DeltaGrad: Rapid retraining of machine learning modelscited by 149
  11. 2021Graph Unlearningcited by 138
  12. 2020Machine Unlearning for Random Forestscited by 131
7 more
  1. 2022The Right to be Forgotten in Federated Learning: An Efficient Realization with Rapid Retrainingcited by 118
  2. 2021Federated Unlearning via Class-Discriminative Pruningcited by 115
  3. 2021ML-Doctor: Holistic Risk Assessment of Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning Modelscited by 85
  4. 2022Recommendation Unlearningcited by 80
  5. 2022Black-box Dataset Ownership Verification via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 65
  6. 2022Progressive Backdoor Erasing via connecting Backdoor and Adversarial Attackscited by 11
  7. 2020Golden Grain: Building a Secure and Decentralized Model Marketplace for MLaaScited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Evaluating of Machine Unlearning: Robustness Verification Without Prior Modifications
  2. 2026EVE: Efficient Verification of Data Erasure through Customized Perturbation in Approximate Unlearning
  3. 2024Verification of Machine Unlearning is Fragile
  4. 2025Efficient Machine Unlearning by Model Splitting and Core Sample Selection
  5. 2026Auditing of Unlearning Algorithms
  6. 2024Machine Unlearning with Minimal Gradient Dependence for High Unlearning Ratios
  7. 2025Mirror Mirror on the Wall, Have I Forgotten it All? A New Framework for Evaluating Machine Unlearning
  8. 2024Remaining-data-free Machine Unlearning by Suppressing Sample Contribution