Evaluating LLMs with Multiple Problems at once
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper shows the benefits and fruitfulness of evaluating LLMs with multiple problems at once, a paradigm we call multi-problem evaluation (MPE). Unlike conventional single-problem evaluation, where a prompt presents a single problem and expects one specific answer, MPE places multiple problems together in a single prompt and assesses how well an LLM answers all these problems in a single output. Leveraging 6 classification and 12 reasoning benchmarks that already exist, we introduce a new benchmark called ZeMPE (Zero-shot Multi-Problem Evaluation), comprising 53,100 zero-shot multi-problem prompts. We experiment with a total of 13 LLMs from 5 model families on ZeMPE to present a comprehensive and systematic MPE. Our results show that LLMs are capable of handling multiple problems from a single data source as well as handling them separately, but there are conditions this multiple problem handling capability falls short. In addition, we perform in-depth further analyses and explore model-level factors that may enable multiple problem handling capabilities in LLMs. We release our corpus and code to facilitate future research.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2024.
Builds on
32 of 55 references.
References · 32
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
- 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
20 more
- 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,437
- 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,278
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 861
- 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
- 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 642
- 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 394
- 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 370
- 2023A Survey of Hallucination in Large Foundation Modelscited by 365
- 2016Solving General Arithmetic Word Problemscited by 353
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 339
- 2024LongRoPE: Extending LLM Context Window Beyond 2 Million Tokenscited by 302
- 2023LooGLE: Can Long-Context Language Models Understand Long Contexts?cited by 200
- 2023ZeroSCROLLS: A Zero-Shot Benchmark for Long Text Understandingcited by 175
- 2023Stop Uploading Test Data in Plain Text: Practical Strategies for Mitigating Data Contamination by Evaluation Benchmarkscited by 139
- 2023A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasetscited by 123
- 2023Large Language Models as Analogical Reasonerscited by 107
- 2023Batch Prompting: Efficient Inference with Large Language Model APIscited by 84
- 2021NeurIPS 2020 EfficientQA Competition: Systems, Analyses and Lessons Learnedcited by 52
- 2024Multi-Task Inference: Can Large Language Models Follow Multiple Instructions at Once?cited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2026DeepResearch Bench II: Diagnosing Deep Research Agents via Rubrics from Expert Reportscited by 33
- 2024SeqAR: Jailbreak LLMs with Sequential Auto-Generated Characterscited by 6
- 2026ATACompressor: Adaptive Task-Aware Compression for Efficient Long-Context Processing in LLMscited by 5
- 2024Compound-QA: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Compound Questionscited by 4
- 2025RWESummary: A Framework and Test for Choosing Large Language Models to Summarize Real-World Evidence (RWE) Studiescited by 0
- 2026ATACompressor: Adaptive Task-Aware Compression for Efficient Long-Context Processing in LLMs3 Feb 2026
- 2026DeepResearch Bench II: Diagnosing Deep Research Agents via Rubrics from Expert Reports13 Jan 2026
- 2025RWESummary: A Framework and Test for Choosing Large Language Models to Summarize Real-World Evidence (RWE) Studies23 Jun 2025
- 2024Compound-QA: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Compound Questions15 Nov 2024
- 2024SeqAR: Jailbreak LLMs with Sequential Auto-Generated Characters2 Jul 2024