Adaptive Experimentation When You Can't Experiment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces the confounded pure exploration transductive linear bandit (textttCPET-LB) problem. As a motivating example, often online services cannot directly assign users to specific control or treatment experiences either for business or practical reasons. In these settings, naively comparing treatment and control groups that may result from self-selection can lead to biased estimates of underlying treatment effects. Instead, online services can employ a properly randomized encouragement that incentivizes users toward a specific treatment. Our methodology provides online services with an adaptive experimental design approach for learning the best-performing treatment for such textitencouragement designs. We consider a more general underlying model captured by a linear structural equation and formulate pure exploration linear bandits in this setting. Though pure exploration has been extensively studied in standard adaptive experimental design settings, we believe this is the first work considering a setting where noise is confounded. Elimination-style algorithms using experimental design methods in combination with a novel finite-time confidence interval on an instrumental variable style estimator are presented with sample complexity upper bounds nearly matching a minimax lower bound. Finally, experiments are conducted that demonstrate the efficacy of our approach.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2024.
Builds on
4 of 7 references.
References · 4
- 2016Causal Bandits: Learning Good Interventions via Causal Inferencecited by 101
- 2019Sequential Experimental Design for Transductive Linear Banditscited by 91
- 2014Designing and Deploying Online Field Experimentscited by 18
- 2017Instrument-Armed Banditscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025Efficient Adaptive Experimentation with Noncompliancecited by 2
- 2026A Component-Based Survey of Interactions between Large Language Models and Multi-Armed Banditscited by 1
- 2024Online Data Collection for Efficient Semiparametric Inferencecited by 0
- 2025Second-Order Bounds for [0,1]-Valued Regression via Betting Losscited by 0
- 2026Nearly Optimal Active Preference Learning and Its Application to LLM Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026Mind the Sim-to-Real Gap & Think Like a Scientistcited by 0
- 2026Mind the Sim-to-Real Gap & Think Like a Scientist20 May 2026
- 2026Nearly Optimal Active Preference Learning and Its Application to LLM Alignment2 Feb 2026
- 2026A Component-Based Survey of Interactions between Large Language Models and Multi-Armed Bandits19 Jan 2026
- 2025Second-Order Bounds for [0,1]-Valued Regression via Betting Loss16 Jul 2025
- 2025Efficient Adaptive Experimentation with Noncompliance23 May 2025
- 2024Online Data Collection for Efficient Semiparametric Inference5 Nov 2024