mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dataset Condensation with Latent Quantile Matching

arXiv 2406.09860 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Dataset condensation (DC) methods aim to learn a smaller synthesized dataset with informative data records to accelerate the training of machine learning models. Current distribution matching (DM) based DC methods learn a synthesized dataset by matching the mean of the latent embeddings between the synthetic and the real dataset. However two distributions with the same mean can still be vastly different. In this work we demonstrate the shortcomings of using Maximum Mean Discrepancy to match latent distributions i.e. the weak matching power and lack of outlier regularization. To alleviate these shortcomings we propose our new method: Latent Quantile Matching (LQM) which matches the quantiles of the latent embeddings to minimize the goodness of fit test statistic between two distributions. Empirical experiments on both image and graph-structured datasets show that LQM matches or outperforms previous state of the art in distribution matching based DC. Moreover we show that LQM improves the performance in continual graph learning (CGL) setting where memory efficiency and privacy can be important. Our work sheds light on the application of DM based DC for CGL.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2024.

Builds on

27 of 46 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  2. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  3. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,871
  4. 2020Dataset Condensation with Gradient Matchingcited by 510
  5. 2022Dataset Distillation by Matching Training Trajectoriescited by 437
  6. 2021Dataset Condensation with Distribution Matchingcited by 362
  7. 2017Deep Gaussian Embedding of Graphs: Unsupervised Inductive Learning via Rankingcited by 332
  8. 2021Dataset Condensation with Differentiable Siamese Augmentationcited by 290
  9. 2013Fast Computation of Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 216
  10. 2022Dataset Condensation via Efficient Synthetic-Data Parameterizationcited by 187
  11. 2022Scaling Up Dataset Distillation to ImageNet-1K with Constant Memorycited by 180
  12. 2022Minimizing the Accumulated Trajectory Error to Improve Dataset Distillationcited by 142
15 more
  1. 2023Improved Distribution Matching for Dataset Condensationcited by 124
  2. 2022Privacy for Free: How does Dataset Condensation Help Privacy?cited by 119
  3. 2023Towards Lossless Dataset Distillation via Difficulty-Aligned Trajectory Matchingcited by 118
  4. 2022Dataset Condensation with Contrastive Signalscited by 105
  5. 2019Generative Teaching Networks: Accelerating Neural Architecture Search by Learning to Generate Synthetic Training Datacited by 103
  6. 2020Flexible Dataset Distillation: Learn Labels Instead of Imagescited by 91
  7. 2023Data Distillation: A Surveycited by 86
  8. 2023DataDAM: Efficient Dataset Distillation with Attention Matchingcited by 83
  9. 2020Federated Learning via Synthetic Datacited by 53
  10. 2021Understanding neural networks with reproducing kernel Banach spacescited by 50
  11. 2023CaT: Balanced Continual Graph Learning with Graph Condensationcited by 50
  12. 2023Dataset Distillation via the Wasserstein Metriccited by 31
  13. 2021An Investigation of Replay-based Approaches for Continual Learningcited by 26
  14. 2019On the Computational Complexity of Finding a Sparse Wasserstein Barycentercited by 8
  15. 2024Benchmarking Sensitivity of Continual Graph Learning for Skeleton-Based Action Recognitioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.