mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Instance-level quantitative saliency in multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation

arXiv 2406.09335 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2024eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods have been proposed to interpret model decisions in classification and, more recently, in semantic segmentation. However, instance-level XAI for semantic segmentation, namely explanations focused on a single object among multiple instances of the same class, remains largely unexplored. Such explanations are particularly important in multi-lesional diseases to understand what drives the detection and contouring of a specific lesion. We propose instance-level explanation maps for semantic segmentation by extending SmoothGrad and Grad-CAM++ to obtain quantitative instance saliency. These methods were applied to the segmentation of white matter lesions (WMLs), a magnetic resonance imaging biomarker in multiple sclerosis. We used 4023 FLAIR and MPRAGE MRI scans from 687 patients collected at the University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland, with WML masks annotated by four expert clinicians. Three deep learning architectures, a 3D U-Net, nnU-Net, and Swin UNETR, were trained and evaluated, achieving normalized Dice scores of 0.71, 0.78, and 0.80, respectively. Instance saliency maps showed that the models relied primarily on FLAIR rather than MPRAGE for WML segmentation, with positive saliency inside lesions and negative saliency in their immediate neighborhood, consistent with clinical practice. Peak saliency values differed significantly across correct and incorrect predictions, suggesting that quantitative instance saliency may help identify segmentation errors. In conclusion, we introduce two architecture-agnostic XAI methods that provide quantitative instance-level explanations for semantic segmentation and support clinically meaningful interpretation of model decisions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2024.

Builds on

18 of 56 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  4. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,476
  5. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  6. 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 959
  7. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  8. 2017CheXNet: Radiologist-Level Pneumonia Detection on Chest X-Rays with Deep Learningcited by 461
  9. 2020Towards Interpretable Semantic Segmentation via Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mappingcited by 49
  10. 2021Towards the Unification and Robustness of Perturbation and Gradient Based Explanationscited by 47
  11. 2020Assessing the (Un)Trustworthiness of Saliency Maps for Localizing Abnormalities in Medical Imagingcited by 32
  12. 2020Understanding Integrated Gradients with SmoothTaylor for Deep Neural Network Attributioncited by 19
6 more
  1. 2023Explainable, Interpretable & Trustworthy AI for Intelligent Digital Twin: Case Study on Remaining Useful Lifecited by 19
  2. 2022blob loss: instance imbalance aware loss functions for semantic segmentationcited by 18
  3. 2021Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Analysis in Brain Magnetic Resonance Images: Techniques and Clinical Applicationscited by 10
  4. 2023Tackling Bias in the Dice Similarity Coefficient: Introducing nDSC for White Matter Lesion Segmentationcited by 8
  5. 2020Standardised convolutional filtering for radiomicscited by 3
  6. 2020Improving Learning Effectiveness For Object Detection and Classification in Cluttered Backgroundscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.