mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A mathematical certification for positivity conditions in Neural Networks with applications to partial monotonicity and Trustworthy AI

arXiv 2406.08525 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have become a powerful tool for modeling complex relationships in large-scale datasets. However, their black-box nature poses trustworthiness challenges. In certain situations, ensuring trust in predictions might require following specific partial monotonicity constraints. However, certifying if an already-trained ANN is partially monotonic is challenging. Therefore, ANNs are often disregarded in some critical applications, such as credit scoring, where partial monotonicity is required. To address this challenge, this paper presents a novel algorithm (LipVor) that certifies if a black-box model, such as an ANN, is positive based on a finite number of evaluations. Consequently, since partial monotonicity can be expressed as a positivity condition on partial derivatives, LipVor can certify whether an ANN is partially monotonic. To do so, for every positively evaluated point, the Lipschitzianity of the black-box model is used to construct a specific neighborhood where the function remains positive. Next, based on the Voronoi diagram of the evaluated points, a sufficient condition is stated to certify if the function is positive in the domain. Unlike prior methods, our approach certifies partial monotonicity without constrained architectures or piece-wise linear activations. Therefore, LipVor could open up the possibility of using unconstrained ANN in some critical fields. Moreover, some other properties of an ANN, such as convexity, can be posed as positivity conditions, and therefore, LipVor could also be applied.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2024.

Builds on

21 of 61 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 415
  3. 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 404
  4. 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
  5. 2020Training robust neural networks using Lipschitz boundscited by 99
  6. 2017Deep Lattice Networks and Partial Monotonic Functionscited by 63
  7. 2020Certified Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 51
  8. 2022Efficiently Computing Local Lipschitz Constants of Neural Networks via Bound Propagationcited by 45
  9. 2020Counterexample-Guided Learning of Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 34
  10. 2022Constrained Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 32
  11. 2019How to Incorporate Monotonicity in Deep Networks While Preserving Flexibility?cited by 21
  12. 2018Monotonic classification: an overview on algorithms, performance measures and data setscited by 18
9 more
  1. 2020Deontological Ethics By Monotonicity Shape Constraintscited by 16
  2. 2020The Curious Case of Convex Neural Networkscited by 16
  3. 2020NeuralSens: Sensitivity Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 14
  4. 2022Size and depth of monotone neural networks: interpolation and approximationcited by 10
  5. 2020Testing Monotonicity of Machine Learning Modelscited by 8
  6. 2021Robust and Provably Monotonic Networkscited by 6
  7. 2022Monotonicity Regularization: Improved Penalties and Novel Applications to Disentangled Representation Learning and Robust Classificationcited by 5
  8. 2023Monotonicity for AI ethics and society: An empirical study of the monotonic neural additive model in criminology, education, health care, and financecited by 4
  9. 2021NN2Poly: A polynomial representation for deep feed-forward artificial neural networkscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.