mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

OPTune: Efficient Online Preference Tuning

arXiv 2406.07657 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.CLcited by 10

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with human feedback~(RLHF) is critical for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preference. Compared to the widely studied offline version of RLHF, e.g. direct preference optimization (DPO), recent works have shown that the online variants achieve even better alignment. However, online alignment requires on-the-fly generation of new training data, which is costly, hard to parallelize, and suffers from varying quality and utility. In this paper, we propose a more efficient data exploration strategy for online preference tuning (OPTune), which does not rely on human-curated or pre-collected teacher responses but dynamically samples informative responses for on-policy preference alignment. During data generation, OPTune only selects prompts whose (re)generated responses can potentially provide more informative and higher-quality training signals than the existing responses. In the training objective, OPTune reweights each generated response (pair) by its utility in improving the alignment so that learning can be focused on the most helpful samples. Throughout our evaluations, OPTune'd LLMs maintain the instruction-following benefits provided by standard preference tuning whilst enjoying 1.27-1.56x faster training speed due to the efficient data exploration strategy.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 28 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2024.

Builds on

28 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Understanding the performance gap between online and offline alignment algorithms14 May
  2. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 25

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  6. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  7. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  8. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  9. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  10. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  11. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
  12. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,615
13 more
  1. 2022SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 1,338
  2. 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,311
  3. 2023Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Samplingcited by 975
  4. 2024Medusa: Simple LLM Inference Acceleration Framework with Multiple Decoding Headscited by 821
  5. 2019Fast Transformer Decoding: One Write-Head is All You Needcited by 700
  6. 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
  7. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 480
  8. 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 395
  9. 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 346
  10. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  11. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHFcited by 265
  12. 2024Strengthening Multimodal Large Language Model with Bootstrapped Preference Optimizationcited by 75
  13. 2023Instruction Mining: Instruction Data Selection for Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 57

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Online Preference Alignment for Language Models via Count-based Exploration
  2. 2024Hybrid Preference Optimization for Alignment: Provably Faster Convergence Rates by Combining Offline Preferences with Online Exploration
  3. 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier
  4. 2026From RLHF to Direct Alignment: A Theoretical Unification of Preference Learning for Large Language Models
  5. 2024SAIL: Self-Improving Efficient Online Alignment of Large Language Models
  6. 2026Spectral Souping: A Unified Framework for Online Preference Alignment
  7. 2024Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment
  8. 2023Sample Efficient Preference Alignment in LLMs via Active Exploration