In-Context Learning and Fine-Tuning GPT for Argument Mining
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become ubiquitous in NLP and deep learning. In-Context Learning (ICL) has been suggested as a bridging paradigm between the training-free and fine-tuning LLMs settings. In ICL, an LLM is conditioned to solve tasks by means of a few solved demonstration examples included as prompt. Argument Mining (AM) aims to extract the complex argumentative structure of a text, and Argument Type Classification (ATC) is an essential sub-task of AM. We introduce an ICL strategy for ATC combining kNN-based examples selection and majority vote ensembling. In the training-free ICL setting, we show that GPT-4 is able to leverage relevant information from only a few demonstration examples and achieve very competitive classification accuracy on ATC. We further set up a fine-tuning strategy incorporating well-crafted structural features given directly in textual form. In this setting, GPT-3.5 achieves state-of-the-art performance on ATC. Overall, these results emphasize the emergent ability of LLMs to grasp global discursive flow in raw text in both off-the-shelf and fine-tuned setups.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2024.
Builds on
8 of 15 references.
References · 8
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2023Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problemscited by 638
- 2023Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicinecited by 329
- 2016Parsing Argumentation Structures in Persuasive Essayscited by 101
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025AMELIA: A Family of Multi-task End-to-end Language Models for Argumentationcited by 3
- 2026LLM-based Argument Mining meets Argumentation and Description Logics: a Unified Framework for Reasoning about Debatescited by 0
- 2026Who Argues What? Joint Argument-Entity Detection and Classification in Political Debatescited by 0
- 2026Who Argues What? Joint Argument-Entity Detection and Classification in Political Debates9 Sep 2026
- 2026LLM-based Argument Mining meets Argumentation and Description Logics: a Unified Framework for Reasoning about Debates3 Mar 2026
- 2025AMELIA: A Family of Multi-task End-to-end Language Models for Argumentation25 Aug 2025