Probability Distribution Learning and Its Application in Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite its empirical success, deep learning still lacks a comprehensive theoretical understanding of model fitting and generalization. This paper proposes the probability distribution (PD) learning framework to analyze the optimization and generalization mechanisms of deep learning. Within this framework, the conditional distribution of labels given features is the primary learning target, with the loss function, prior knowledge, and model properties explicitly characterized. Under these formulations, we establish theoretical guarantees on optimizability, even in non-convex settings, and derive generalization error bounds that provide meaningful explanations for practical performance. Specifically, we first prove theoretically that the Fenchel-Young loss is the natural and necessary choice for solving PD learning problems, thereby justifying the generality of conclusions based on this loss. Second, to capture the characteristics of deep neural networks (DNNs), we introduce the notions of H(psi)-convexity and H(Psi)-smoothness, which generalize the classical concepts of strong convexity and Lipschitz smoothness. Based on them, we provide a theoretical explanation for the effectiveness of SGD in training DNNs. Finally, we derive model-independent bounds on the expected risk and generalization error for trained models, revealing the influence of the training set size, regularization term, the mutual information between labels and features, and the information loss caused by model irreversibility on risk and generalization. Based on our theoretical analysis and experimental validation, we believe that the PD learning framework facilitates a deeper and more unified theoretical understanding of deep learning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2024.
Builds on
45 of 88 references.
References · 45
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
- 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 759
33 more
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 716
- 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 655
- 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 494
- 2018A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networkscited by 463
- 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 462
- 2018On the Global Convergence of Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Models using Optimal Transportcited by 422
- 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 299
- 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 286
- 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 270
- 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 234
- 2021Invariance Principle Meets Information Bottleneck for Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 220
- 2020The large learning rate phase of deep learning: the catapult mechanismcited by 206
- 2019Universal Approximation with Deep Narrow Networkscited by 198
- 2017Approximating Continuous Functions by ReLU Nets of Minimal Widthcited by 120
- 2019Learning with Fenchel-Young Lossescited by 117
- 2018Mean Field Analysis of Neural Networks: A Central Limit Theoremcited by 107
- 2022When Do Flat Minima Optimizers Work?cited by 78
- 2022The alignment property of SGD noise and how it helps select flat minima: A stability analysiscited by 64
- 2021Uniform Convergence of Interpolators: Gaussian Width, Norm Bounds, and Benign Overfittingcited by 54
- 2024Transformers Learn Nonlinear Features In Context: Nonconvex Mean-field Dynamics on the Attention Landscapecited by 43
- 2016Gradient Descent Only Converges to Minimizers: Non-Isolated Critical Points and Invariant Regionscited by 33
- 2020Analyzing Finite Neural Networks: Can We Trust Neural Tangent Kernel Theory?cited by 33
- 2023NTK-SAP: Improving neural network pruning by aligning training dynamicscited by 30
- 2018Small nonlinearities in activation functions create bad local minima in neural networkscited by 28
- 2022Flat minima generalize for low-rank matrix recoverycited by 28
- 2022A New Family of Generalization Bounds Using Samplewise Evaluated CMIcited by 28
- 2024Gradient Alignment for Cross-Domain Face Anti-Spoofingcited by 26
- 2024Flatten Long-Range Loss Landscapes for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learningcited by 26
- 2019Double descent in the condition numbercited by 14
- 2022Understanding Benign Overfitting in Gradient-Based Meta Learningcited by 11
- 2022Annihilation of Spurious Minima in Two-Layer ReLU Networkscited by 9
- 2024NTK-Guided Few-Shot Class Incremental Learningcited by 7
- 2021On the Double Descent of Random Features Models Trained with SGDcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.