mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Intention and Face in Dialog

arXiv 2406.04109 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The notion of face described by Brown and Levinson (1987) has been studied in great detail, but a critical aspect of the framework, that which focuses on how intentions mediate the planning of turns which impose upon face, has received far less attention. We present an analysis of three computational systems trained for classifying both intention and politeness, focusing on how the former influences the latter. In politeness theory, agents attend to the desire to have their wants appreciated (positive face), and a complementary desire to act unimpeded and maintain freedom (negative face). Similar to speech acts, utterances can perform so-called face acts which can either raise or threaten the positive or negative face of the speaker or hearer. We begin by using an existing corpus to train a model which classifies face acts, achieving a new SoTA in the process. We then observe that every face act has an underlying intention that motivates it and perform additional experiments integrating dialog act annotations to provide these intentions by proxy. Our analysis finds that dialog acts improve performance on face act detection for minority classes and points to a close relationship between aspects of face and intent.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2024.

Builds on

4 of 24 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Goodcited by 207
  2. 2013A Computational Approach to Politeness with Application to Social Factorscited by 104
  3. 2021Speaker Turn Modeling for Dialogue Act Classificationcited by 18
  4. 2020Keeping Up Appearances: Computational Modeling of Face Acts in Persuasion Oriented Discussionscited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.