mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tolerant Algorithms for Learning with Arbitrary Covariate Shift

arXiv 2406.02742 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2024cs.DS cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of learning under arbitrary distribution shift, where the learner is trained on a labeled set from one distribution but evaluated on a different, potentially adversarially generated test distribution. We focus on two frameworks: PQ learning [Goldwasser, A. Kalai, Y. Kalai, Montasser NeurIPS 2020], allowing abstention on adversarially generated parts of the test distribution, and TDS learning [Klivans, Stavropoulos, Vasilyan COLT 2024], permitting abstention on the entire test distribution if distribution shift is detected. All prior known algorithms either rely on learning primitives that are computationally hard even for simple function classes, or end up abstaining entirely even in the presence of a tiny amount of distribution shift. We address both these challenges for natural function classes, including intersections of halfspaces and decision trees, and standard training distributions, including Gaussians. For PQ learning, we give efficient learning algorithms, while for TDS learning, our algorithms can tolerate moderate amounts of distribution shift. At the core of our approach is an improved analysis of spectral outlier-removal techniques from learning with nasty noise. Our analysis can (1) handle arbitrarily large fraction of outliers, which is crucial for handling arbitrary distribution shifts, and (2) obtain stronger bounds on polynomial moments of the distribution after outlier removal, yielding new insights into polynomial regression under distribution shifts. Lastly, our techniques lead to novel results for tolerant testable learning [Rubinfeld and Vasilyan STOC 2023], and learning with nasty noise.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2024.

Builds on

27 of 53 references.

References · 27

  1. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 374
  2. 2016Robust Estimators in High Dimensions without the Computational Intractabilitycited by 209
  3. 2016Agnostic Estimation of Mean and Covariancecited by 131
  4. 2020A survey on domain adaptation theory: learning bounds and theoretical guaranteescited by 109
  5. 2019Recent Advances in Algorithmic High-Dimensional Robust Statisticscited by 100
  6. 2018Efficient Algorithms for Outlier-Robust Regressioncited by 72
  7. 2017Learning Geometric Concepts with Nasty Noisecited by 46
  8. 2020Beyond Perturbations: Learning Guarantees with Arbitrary Adversarial Test Examplescited by 44
  9. 2020Robust and Heavy-Tailed Mean Estimation Made Simple, via Regret Minimizationcited by 44
  10. 2022Testing distributional assumptions of learning algorithmscited by 30
  11. 2022A Moment-Matching Approach to Testable Learning and a New Characterization of Rademacher Complexitycited by 27
  12. 2023Testable Learning with Distribution Shiftcited by 25
15 more
  1. 2017Better Agnostic Clustering Via Relaxed Tensor Normscited by 21
  2. 2023Efficient Testable Learning of Halfspaces with Adversarial Label Noisecited by 19
  3. 2023An Efficient Tester-Learner for Halfspacescited by 18
  4. 2023Tester-Learners for Halfspaces: Universal Algorithmscited by 17
  5. 2021Efficient Learning with Arbitrary Covariate Shiftcited by 15
  6. 2021The Price of Tolerance in Distribution Testingcited by 13
  7. 2024Learning Intersections of Halfspaces with Distribution Shift: Improved Algorithms and SQ Lower Boundscited by 13
  8. 2023Adversarial Resilience in Sequential Prediction via Abstentioncited by 11
  9. 2024Transfer Learning Beyond Bounded Density Ratioscited by 6
  10. 2017Active Tolerant Testingcited by 4
  11. 2016Tolerant Junta Testing and the Connection to Submodular Optimization and Function Isomorphismcited by 3
  12. 2020Monotone probability distributions over the Boolean cube can be learned with sublinear samplescited by 3
  13. 2015Sampling Correctorscited by 2
  14. 2021Exploring the Gap between Tolerant and Non-tolerant Distribution Testingcited by 2
  15. 2023New Lower Bounds for Adaptive Tolerant Junta Testingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 6; 2026: 8.

15 papers.

Sort: