Offline Bayesian Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification and Posterior Value Optimisation in Finite-State MDPs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We address the challenge of quantifying Bayesian uncertainty and incorporating it in offline use cases of finite-state Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) with unknown dynamics. Our approach provides a principled method to disentangle epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty, and a novel technique to find policies that optimise Bayesian posterior expected value without relying on strong assumptions about the MDP's posterior distribution. First, we utilise standard Bayesian reinforcement learning methods to capture the posterior uncertainty in MDP parameters based on available data. We then analytically compute the first two moments of the return distribution across posterior samples and apply the law of total variance to disentangle aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. To find policies that maximise posterior expected value, we leverage the closed-form expression for value as a function of policy. This allows us to propose a stochastic gradient-based approach for solving the problem. We illustrate the uncertainty quantification and Bayesian posterior value optimisation performance of our agent in simple, interpretable gridworlds and validate it through ground-truth evaluations on synthetic MDPs. Finally, we highlight the real-world impact and computational scalability of our method by applying it to the AI Clinician problem, which recommends treatment for patients in intensive care units and has emerged as a key use case of finite-state MDPs with offline data. We discuss the challenges that arise with Bayesian modelling of larger scale MDPs while demonstrating the potential to apply our methods rooted in Bayesian decision theory into the real world. We make our code available at https://github.com/filippovaldettaro/finite-state-mdps .
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2024.
Builds on
14 of 40 references.
References · 14
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
- 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
- 2020MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimizationcited by 630
- 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 582
- 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
- 2021Uncertainty-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Diversified Q-Ensemblecited by 297
- 2015Risk-Sensitive and Robust Decision-Making: a CVaR Optimization Approachcited by 162
- 2019Estimating Risk and Uncertainty in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
- 2021Risk-Averse Bayes-Adaptive Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
- 2022Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimism-Modulated Dynamics Beliefcited by 22
- 2018Bayesian Policy Optimization for Model Uncertaintycited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.