mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HoneyGPT: Breaking the Trilemma in Terminal Honeypots with Large Language Model

arXiv 2406.01882 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2024cs.CR cs.AI cs.ETcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Honeypots, as a strategic cyber-deception mechanism designed to emulate authentic interactions and bait unauthorized entities, often struggle with balancing flexibility, interaction depth, and deception. They typically fail to adapt to evolving attacker tactics, with limited engagement and information gathering. Fortunately, the emergent capabilities of large language models and innovative prompt-based engineering offer a transformative shift in honeypot technologies. This paper introduces HoneyGPT, a pioneering shell honeypot architecture based on ChatGPT, characterized by its cost-effectiveness and proactive engagement. In particular, we propose a structured prompt engineering framework that incorporates chain-of-thought tactics to improve long-term memory and robust security analytics, enhancing deception and engagement. Our evaluation of HoneyGPT comprises a baseline comparison based on a collected dataset and a three-month field evaluation. The baseline comparison demonstrates HoneyGPT's remarkable ability to strike a balance among flexibility, interaction depth, and deceptive capability. The field evaluation further validates HoneyGPT's superior performance in engaging attackers more deeply and capturing a wider array of novel attack vectors.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2024.

Builds on

14 of 44 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  3. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
  4. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  5. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  6. 2021Asleep at the Keyboard? Assessing the Security of GitHub Copilot's Code Contributionscited by 417
  7. 2023Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical Perspectivecited by 293
  8. 2023Large Language Models for Code: Security Hardening and Adversarial Testingcited by 149
  9. 2022Generating Natural Language Proofs with Verifier-Guided Searchcited by 52
  10. 2022Chain of Thought Imitation with Procedure Cloningcited by 30
  11. 2023Two-in-One: A Model Hijacking Attack Against Text Generation Modelscited by 11
  12. 2020Duplicity Games for Deception Design with an Application to Insider Threat Mitigationcited by 8
2 more
  1. 2016Characterizing Honeypot-Captured Cyber Attacks: Statistical Framework and Case Studycited by 3
  2. 2022Collaborative Honeypot Defense in UAV Networks: A Learning-Based Game Approachcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026HoneyTrap: Deceiving Large Language Model Attackers to Honeypot Traps with Resilient Multi-Agent Defense
  2. 2026LLM-Based Penetration Testing in the Presence of Honeypots ↗
  3. 2025SBASH: a Framework for Designing and Evaluating RAG vs. Prompt-Tuned LLM Honeypots
  4. 2026Honeyquest for LLMs: Rethinking Cyber Deception for AI Attackers
  5. 2026Speculative Safety Honeypot: Toward Proactive Defense Against Multi-turn Agent Attacks
  6. 2026AdvancedShelLM: A Stateful Multi-Agent LLM Honeypot for SSH Deception
  7. 2024LLM Agent Honeypot: Monitoring AI Hacking Agents in the Wild
  8. 2026A Layered Security Framework Against Prompt Injection in RAG-Based Chatbots