mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Gender Bias Detection in Court Decisions: A Brazilian Case Study

arXiv 2406.00393 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2024cs.CL cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data derived from the realm of the social sciences is often produced in digital text form, which motivates its use as a source for natural language processing methods. Researchers and practitioners have developed and relied on artificial intelligence techniques to collect, process, and analyze documents in the legal field, especially for tasks such as text summarization and classification. While increasing procedural efficiency is often the primary motivation behind natural language processing in the field, several works have proposed solutions for human rights-related issues, such as assessment of public policy and institutional social settings. One such issue is the presence of gender biases in court decisions, which has been largely studied in social sciences fields; biased institutional responses to gender-based violence are a violation of international human rights dispositions since they prevent gender minorities from accessing rights and hamper their dignity. Natural language processing-based approaches can help detect these biases on a larger scale. Still, the development and use of such tools require researchers and practitioners to be mindful of legal and ethical aspects concerning data sharing and use, reproducibility, domain expertise, and value-charged choices. In this work, we (a) present an experimental framework developed to automatically detect gender biases in court decisions issued in Brazilian Portuguese and (b) describe and elaborate on features we identify to be critical in such a technology, given its proposed use as a support tool for research and assessment of court~activity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2024.

Builds on

10 of 66 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,362
  2. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  3. 2023Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedbackcited by 351
  4. 2023Summary of ChatGPT-Related Research and Perspective Towards the Future of Large Language Modelscited by 152
  5. 2021A Survey on Data Augmentation for Text Classificationcited by 111
  6. 2020Participation is not a Design Fix for Machine Learningcited by 110
  7. 2022Theories of "Gender" in NLP Bias Researchcited by 62
  8. 2019Roles for Computing in Social Changecited by 49
  9. 2021Studying Up Machine Learning Data: Why Talk About Bias When We Mean Power?cited by 11
  10. 2022Should I disclose my dataset? Caveats between reproducibility and individual data rightscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.